Search icone
Search and publish your papers
Our Guarantee
We guarantee quality.
Find out more!

Communication Process

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

Security
Level
General public
Study
criminal law
School/University
University...

About the document

Vincent L.
Published date
Language
documents in English
Format
Word
Type
case study
Pages
2 pages
Level
General public
Accessed
1 times
Validated by
Committee Oboolo.com
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction
  2. The communication climate at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam Security Department
  3. The wheel communication network
  4. The strengths and weaknesses of the communications within JBPHH-SD
  5. The management approach
  6. Transformational leadership style
  7. Conclusion

Communication has been a humanistic function that has been present since the beginning of mankind. Communication is the process on how, we as human being share, and exchange information to each other. The way we communicate is not limited to information flow, but also expresses control, motivation, emotional expression through the words that are spoken, and signals by body language (Robbins & Judge, 2009). This paper discusses communication process in an organization of the members in Team C. Included in this discussion are describing the communication climate in your organization, what are the strengths and weaknesses of your work organization's communication, and does the management approach of your organization's supervisors, managers, and executives contribute to or detract from effective communication (University of Phoenix, 2010).

The communication climate at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam Security Department (JBPHH-SD) is currently a mix between effective and ineffective using both the chain and wheel network models. The United States Air Force (USAF) and Navy (USN) military components effectively use the chain communication network because of their rank hierarchical structures (Robbins & Judge, 2009).

[...] Contrarily, the weaknesses of communications within JBPHH-SD are low expectations, minimal accomplishments, and focus on short-term problems. Every one of the former weaknesses stems from the widespread dysfunction of communications within the civil service components of JBPHH-SD. For example, performance appraisals have only two options, satisfactory or unsatisfactory, negating any of the differences between excellent and poor performers. The management approach of an organization's supervisors, managers, and executives do contribute or detract from effective communication (University of Phoenix, 2010). JBPHH-SD uses a couple of management approaches to motivate its personnel to undertake change, which are transactional and transformational leadership. [...]


[...] This paper discusses communication process in an organization of the members in Team C. Included in this discussion are describing the communication climate in your organization, what are the strengths and weaknesses of your work organization's communication, and does the management approach of your organization's supervisors, managers, and executives contribute to or detract from effective communication (University of Phoenix, 2010). The communication climate at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam Security Department (JBPHH-SD) is currently a mix between effective and ineffective using both the chain and wheel network models. [...]

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

Structuring the communication process between the nurse and patient/client

 Science & technology   |  Medical studies   |  Term papers   |  07/10/2009   |   .doc   |   4 pages

Communication skill assessment

 Business & market   |  Business strategy   |  Case study   |  05/15/2013   |   .doc   |   2 pages

Top sold for business strategy

Carlton Polish Co.

 Business & market   |  Business strategy   |  Market study   |  11/18/2011   |   .pdf   |   9 pages

Does competition affect social preferences in the context of a bargaining game? Discuss

 Business & market   |  Business strategy   |  Case study   |  05/21/2012   |   .doc   |   3 pages