Or have Oboolo for free :
Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

 
Level
General public
Study
economics
School/University
MIMS, Mumbai

About the document

Published date
11/13/2009
Language
documents in English
Format
Word
Type
term papers
Pages
3 pages
Level
General public
Accessed
7 times
Validated by
Committee Oboolo.com
0 Comment
Rate this document

Case study: American home products

  1. Introduction
  2. The company's debt policy
  3. The company's reliance
  4. Recommendation
    1. The takeovers
    2. Maintaining the debt ratio
    3. Avoiding higher debt ration
  5. Business and financial risk
    1. AHP's operating strategy
    2. Leverage: Good or bad ?
  6. Conclusion

American Home Products manages diverse business ranging from packaged drugs, food products and household products. The company believes in aggressive marketing strategy which has helped company cloak phenomenal growth over the years. Being the consumer product company, it has cash rich balance sheet. The company has generated sales in excess of $4 billion with growth ranging between 10%-15% annually; and remarkable gains in market share while reducing or maintaining a low level of expenses. All this combined with dividend growth of 222% between 1972 – 1981, contributed to the firm’s AAA bond rating and to the popularity of AHP’s stock among retail and, primarily, institutional investors.

[...] Additionally, the company’s financing needs outside of cash to repurchase outstanding stock is not great considering that AHP does not launch new products until a product has been proven successful in the market. We also would avoid a higher debt ratio from a personal perspective. Due to Mr. Laporte’s conservative nature, we do not believe that he would welcome the recommendation of a drastic change to the company’s capital structure a move defined by an increase from 30% to 50 70% debt. [...]


[...] risk and tax issues when deciding on an optimal debt ratio. Recommendation After reviewing the disclosed information, we believe that AHP and its shareholders are best served by maintaining a debt ratio of 30% and using a portion of cash reserves to repurchase outstanding AHP stock. Given Mr. Laporte’s unique brand of management and company control, we believe that the primary argument for maintaining a 30% debt ratio is the threat of corporate takeover via a leveraged buyout. A method of corporate takeover or merger popularized in the 1980s, leveraged buyouts involved the purchase of controlling interest in a company’s corporate stock with a substantial fraction of borrowed funds financed with the takeover company’s assets. [...]

...

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

Culture case study: Valley Farms International & cultural group assessment

 Social studies   |  Sociology   |  Presentation   |  01/20/2009   |   .doc   |   14 pages

Segmentation: A global framework or a local necessity? Case study - L'Oreal

 Business & market   |  Marketing   |  Case study   |  09/29/2010   |   .doc   |   42 pages

Top sold for business strategy

The case of Loctite Corporation

 Business & market   |  Business strategy   |  Term papers   |  08/28/2009   |   .doc   |   5 pages

Brand study of Louis Vuitton

 Business & market   |  Business strategy   |  Term papers   |  05/16/2009   |   .doc   |   10 pages
Search and publish your papers
Our Guarantee
We guarantee quality.
Find out more!