Search icone
Search and publish your papers
Our Guarantee
We guarantee quality.
Find out more!

A research study on performance management system in an organization

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

freelance writer
Level
General public
Study
computer...
School/University
BITS

About the document

Sanjay K.
Published date
Language
documents in English
Format
Word
Type
term papers
Pages
11 pages
Level
General public
Accessed
0 times
Validated by
Committee Oboolo.com
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction
  2. Objectives of performance management system
  3. Applicability
  4. Focus on performance management system
  5. Performance measures
    1. Competencies and evaluation
    2. Competencies and ratings
    3. Rating of competencies
    4. Company values and ratings
  6. Questionnaire analysis
  7. Findings
    1. According to employees
  8. Bibliography

A company reviews the existing appraisal system of senior executive levels. The revised performance management system has components of performance planning, monitoring, review and development through involvement of the appraisee is being introduced. The focus of the performance management system for senior executives is to appraise them on different components of managerial responsibilities, consisting of performance, generic managerial competencies, values and potential, totaling to 100 marks. The system provides for the reporting officer (appraiser) and the executive (appraisee) to identify through discussion and agree upon a set of Key Performance Areas (KPAs) in brief at the beginning of the first half-year.

[...] Initiative and Speed: The Executive believes in taking the first step, thinking new and ahead and being swift without compromising on quality; he is creative and innovative and has the willingness to experiment and take risks. E. Total Quality: The Executive believes in pursuing excellence in all spheres of activity; he makes continuous efforts in improving standards of performance, systems and processes. Each value has to be evaluated through discussion on a rating scale of 1 to 5 the rating 1 being the lowest and 5 being the highest. [...]


[...] The aggregate of marks obtained for different KPAs is worked out and indicated as aggregate of IA. Both the Appraisee and the Reporting Officer sign the Part IA. Second half performance The System helps to review the Key Performance Area Targets for the Second Half-Year based on the evaluation of 1st half-year KPAs depending on actual achievements. The reworked KPA targets are briefly recorded, ?Measures' for each KPA defined and Marks allocated. KPAs which extend beyond the 1st half year may be re- recorded in the targets of the 2nd half-year. [...]

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

Study on the effects of the relationship between contingency variables and BSC system property...

 Business & market   |  Management   |  Research papers   |  04/06/2010   |   .pdf   |   13 pages

Performance evaluation of supply chains

 Business & market   |  Logistics   |  Term papers   |  11/22/2010   |   .doc   |   16 pages

Top sold for human resources

Andrew Ryan at VC Brakes Case Analysis

 Business & market   |  Human resources   |  Presentation   |  10/09/2015   |   .doc   |   5 pages

Segmentation and Target Marketing - CALVIN KLEIN INC

 Business & market   |  Human resources   |  Case study   |  09/03/2014   |   .pdf   |   5 pages