Conditions of success of a country structure in Madagascar
- The beginning of Nationalists drift
- The progressive integration of Jews
- The legacy of traditional Judaism
- Persistent prejudices
- The rise of antisemitism in the 1880s
- The Jew, 'scapegoat of modernity '
- Strengthening the construction of identity in race
- Discomfort spread by the press and the literature
- The violent antisemitism led to a division of corporations
- Of termination to the exclusion
- The instrumentalization of anti-Semitism by political forces
- Zionism, a response to the barbaric antisemitism
The structuring of a peasant organization in the grassroots community to ensure its smooth functioning is not an end in itself. It is an important step in the process of accountability of its members to ensure success and sustainability of the structure. In fact, the effective participation of future members in defining problems, common goals, and finding solutions is a major asset, but not sufficient to make the structure a development tool for members. It is therefore necessary to operate the structure and hence to find criteria that can contribute to its success in meeting the needs of development of its members.
At the same time, it is necessary to determine the roles of facilitators and leaders of the structure in this process. What are the criteria or basic conditions created to operate and achieve its development objectives? And what are the roles and functions of leaders and leaders of the structure after the structure? The following is an excerpt from the document: "Periodic evaluations are necessary to measure performance, results of operations, difference in achievements against objectives, and analyze the causes. The resources (human, material and financial) were used [and] they contributed to the achievement of results and are they effectively managed and used wisely? The objective is to rectify the shooting, the errors for better management structure. Par addition, members of the organization must hold regular meetings of their self-assessment to self-criticism to improve their behavior in the conduct of the organization they reap the benefits. "
All members of the Group / Association must appropriate depth of the objectives of the Group in the short and long term. These goals should be realistic and appropriate to the development of the Group. The establishment of an organization is not an end in itself, it is only a step and an essential tool to achieve the development goals set by members and solve any problems they encounter. For this purpose, it should involve all members in this vision for the future to create a spirit of motivation despite the potential problems that the group may encounter during its operation. The question is whether the objectives that have been set are suitable for all members. The different perception of the objectives hinders the operation of the Organization. The facilitator must find a way to lead the members to agree on one or a few realistic goals that are priorities.
The activities selected must contribute to achieving the objectives and implementation follows a definite plan of action. The choice of activities are based on their viability in terms of:
? Technical: Are the actions and projects that the organization prepares possible from the technical point of view? Can we achieve success?
? Are the economic activities profitable? Will they increase the income of members, and improve their standard of living?
? Social: Are the social initiatives useful for members of the group? And for the community?
? Functioning: Will everyone find something of interest? Will the members work in the agreement? Can they get organized to conduct the actions decided?
Tags: grassroots community, development objectives, standard of living