Andrew Jackson: Trial reflection
- Jackson's first run for president in the 1824.
- Jackson's nomination for presidency in 1828.
- Trial recount.
- Selection of the jury and reading of the charges.
- The prosecutions reference to the National Bank as Jackson's 'personal bank war'.
- The defense's opening statement.
- The prosecution's first witness Daniel Webster.
- The prosecution's second witness Nicholas Biddle.
- Cross examination.
- The defense's first witness Roger B. Teney.
- The defense's second witness Martin Van Buren.
- The defendant.
- The strongest points considered from the prosecution.
- Trial evaluation.
- NGO Monitor's denouncing of Amnesty International for selectivity in its coverage and political bias.
Andrew Jackson was born on March 15, 1767 in Lancaster County, straddling the state line of both North and South Carolina. Although both states claimed Jackson as their own, he himself always stated that South Carolina was his home. His parents were Presbyterian Scottish-Irish immigrants and Jackson was born just weeks after the death of his father. When Jackson was thirteen, the American Revolutionary war was going on, and Jackson joined his local regiment as a courier. During the war, Jackson and his brother, Robert Jackson, were taken prisoner by the British and nearly starved to death. Both brothers contracted smallpox during their imprisonment and Robert died days after his release was secured. Jackson's entire immediate family died due to the war, leaving Jackson with a permanent hate for the British.
[...] He asserted the following: popularity of text messaging may also explain the penchant among the Junior Cert students for short, sharp answers with little elaboration. The examiner complains how many candidates were "choosing to answer sparingly, even minimally, rather than seeing questions as invitations to explore the territory they had studied and to express the breadth and depth of their learning and understanding." The examiner recognized some exceptional pieces of writing, but went on to say that most of the candidates still needed learn how to develop their writing to be more personally expressive. [...]
[...] For some it is difficult to see an instant message as being an avenue for intellectual thinking and writing. However, studies have shown that teenagers who use this type of short message system are creative writers, analyzing thinkers, and language innovators. A recent study conducted by linguists at the University of Toronto studied the instant messaging practices of 71 young people ages 15 to 20 years old. Researchers Derik Denis and Sali Tagliamonte found that teenagers are pulling from many linguistic resources available to them. [...]
[...] Steve Peha, president of the education consulting company Teaching That Makes Sense Inc., puts it plainly in these words: writing has to be authentic? (McCarroll, 2005). This authenticity in writing is actually more representative of the world adolescents live in. The need to be authentic and true to oneself is a popular truism for young people today. Where does this leave us? It is clear that there is a division of opinion regarding the writing practices of teens and young adults who also engage in SMS communications. [...]