Search icone
Search and publish your papers
Our Guarantee
We guarantee quality.
Find out more!

An Animal’s place in America

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

Director of Development
Level
Advanced
Study
film studies
School/University
Emerson...

About the document

Joseph P.
Published date
Language
documents in English
Format
Word
Type
school essay
Pages
3 pages
Level
Advanced
Accessed
1 times
Validated by
Committee Oboolo.com
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction
  2. The most highly validating aspect of Pollan's article
  3. The suffering of animals
  4. Key concepts of Animal Liberation
  5. Kant's belief about the treatment of a 'rational creature'
  6. The suffering of any living creature
  7. Michael Pollan's solution
  8. Conclusion
  9. Works cited

In 1975, an Australian philosopher by the name of Peter Singer first published his controversial book Animal Liberation. It has since become widely known as the beginning of the current ?animal liberation movement? in America. The book preached the virtues of vegetarianism and vilified the American agribusiness, which Singer believed was highly immoral. Singer's Animal Liberation has had many varying effects on the world; and specifically, the United States. Singer's book had a great number of admirer's, as well as its fair share of critics. In November of 2002, New York Times contributing writer Michael Pollan wrote an article entitled ?An Animal's Place.? This article dispelled some of the myths behind Singer's Animal Liberation, as well criticized some of Singer's ideas. Pollan's article, however, is more than a mere argument against Singer's belief system. Pollan delves into Singer's arguments, and points out that while some are valid, many are not.

[...] vegetarianism, and it didn't take long for me to see why: within a few pages, he had succeeded in throwing me on the defensive? (Pollan 2). Once the defensive,? Pollan begins laying down the basis for his personal ?philosophy?; one that opposes Singer's on many levels. One of the founding concepts in Peter Singer's Animal Liberation is the comparison between non-functioning humans (including the demented and the severely retarded) and those animals with higher-functioning minds (such as chimpanzees). Likewise, the backbone of Michael Pollan's argument falls amidst this comparison. [...]


[...] Peter Singer's heart is in the right place. Animal suffering is never a good thing, and Singer is correct in wanting to put an end to it wherever possible. His ideas for accomplishing this goal are, however, unreasonable. Factory farms need to be reformed, but convincing people to stop eating meat all together is not the answer. Pollan is a meat-eater; and doesn't plan on stopping. Like Singer, he denounces the way factory farms treat animals, but thinks that people should focus [...]

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

Can Mercosur become the European Union in Latin America?

 Law & contracts   |  International   |  Term papers   |  12/17/2010   |   .doc   |   16 pages

Top sold for literature

Langston Hughes's "Trumpet Player"

 Philosophy & literature   |  Literature   |  Term papers   |  05/30/2008   |   .doc   |   2 pages

An essay on Chess by Rosario Castellanos

 Philosophy & literature   |  Literature   |  Term papers   |  02/28/2010   |   .doc   |   2 pages