Search icone
Search and publish your papers
Our Guarantee
We guarantee quality.
Find out more!

A Just Cause

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

 
Level
General public
Study
internation...
School/University
University...

About the document

Aubrey K.
Published date
Language
documents in English
Format
Word
Type
presentations
Pages
3 pages
Level
General public
Accessed
9 times
Validated by
Committee Oboolo.com
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction
  2. Walzer's view on intervening in another nation's practices or problems
  3. Walzer's exceptions to this general prohibition of intervention
  4. Overriding the non-intervention principle and the case of humanitarian crises
  5. His attempt to limit the means the Allied forces could use to effect the fall of the Nazis
  6. Conclusion

As Michael Walzer frequently states, ?war is hell?; however, that has not stopped people from engaging in it for thousands of years. There are a variety of reasons nations have entered war, among them are: territorial expansion, the spread of democracy, self-defense, and humanitarian crises to name a few. According to Walzer, however, some of these reasons are more justified than others, and some of them are not justifiable at all. While some people may view war as an aberration of human behavior and decency, Walzer believes that some wars are not only justified, but also necessary, such as the Allied response in World War Two. For an institution as chaotic and violent as war, Walzer seeks to create parameters and conventions. Thus, in his book, Just and Unjust Wars, Walzer attempts to establish, among other things, what exactly a ?just war? is, what the rules of war are, and who they apply to, and when intervention is a morally legitimate response.

[...] Thus, Mill does not believe that intervention and liberty can coincide: if a community is handed its liberty by an outside force, it is not truly free (p. 88). While Mill's view has been criticized as a ?Darwinian? position, Walzer supports the non-intervention principle. One reason for this support is that if a country cannot free itself, it may need considerable assistance after a revolution has taken place. Therefore, the community would not be free to determine its political institutions and practices: it would need the help of an outsider to establish democratic traditions. [...]


[...] In quoting Winston Churchill, Walzer makes his point perfectly clear: demand for unconditional surrender does not mean that are entitled to behave in a barbarous manner, nor that wish to blot out Germany from among the nations of Europe if we are bound, we are bound by our own consciences to civilization? (Walzer, p. 112). Thus, Walzer emphasizes that even in cases in which a nation is fighting great evil; the rights of civilians and the rules of war must still be respected. [...]

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

Causes of the American revolution

 Politics & international   |  Political science   |  Term papers   |  12/15/2010   |   .doc   |   5 pages

Are information and communication technology advances a partial cause of the financial crisis of...

 Economics & finance   |  Finance   |  Case study   |  05/07/2013   |   .doc   |   7 pages

Top sold for international relations

To what extent was the air campaign in operation Iraqi freedom a military success but a public...

 Politics & international   |  International affairs   |  Term papers   |  02/15/2010   |   .doc   |   15 pages

Israel / Palestine : Ongoing Conflict And Elusive Peace

 Politics & international   |  International affairs   |  Presentation   |  09/29/2010   |   .doc   |   5 pages