Search icone
Search and publish your papers
Our Guarantee
We guarantee quality.
Find out more!

Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

Lawyer/Lecturer
Level
General public
Study
criminal law
School/University
USIU

About the document

Herold k.
Published date
Language
documents in English
Format
Word
Type
case study
Pages
2 pages
Level
General public
Accessed
0 times
Validated by
Committee Oboolo.com
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction
  2. Discussion
  3. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion
  4. Conclusion

Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion by Hume tries to explain whether there is a possibility of religious belief being rational. Hume being an empiricist, someone who believes that all kinds of knowledge are got through experience, strongly reasons that beliefs are rational only if they are adequately reinforced by experiential evidence. This leads us to the question that seek to find out whether there is sufficient evidence in the world that allows individuals to assume an infinitely wise, good, perfect and powerful God. Hume is not concerned if individuals can rationally prove the existence of God but if they can draw conclusions on the nature of God.

Hume has presented three characters that he has given different positions to represent on the issue. The three characters are in a conversational dialogue. Demea is given the responsibility to argue for religious Orthodoxy. He reasons that there is no way an individual can come to understand God's nature through reason. He vehemently believes that no one can ever know God's nature at all cost since God's nature is characteristically beyond the comprehension of human beings. Philo, a philosophical skeptic concurs with Demea in his reasoning that God cannot be comprehended by human beings. However, he goes ahead to give convincing opinions for his position. Cleanthes on the other hand argue according to empirical theism- the notion that individuals can understand about God through reasoning from all the evidence that has been presented by nature (Hume 80). He argues against Demea and Philo. His empirical theism belief is based on the design argument which states that the beauty and complexity of the universe can be explained only by speculating the existence of one intelligent designer, who in this case is God.

[...] Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion Introduction Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion by Hume tries to explain whether there is a possibility of religious belief being rational. Hume being an empiricist, someone who believes that all kinds of knowledge are got through experience, strongly reasons that beliefs are rational only if they are adequately reinforced by experiential evidence. This leads us to the question that seek to find out whether there is sufficient evidence in the world that allows individuals to assume an infinitely wise, good, perfect and powerful God. [...]


[...] On the other hand, Cleanthes would be happy with the way the conversation ended since he was declared the victor. Conclusion In a nutshell, Hume has successfully ended the book with a literary device. Declaring Cleanthes the victor confirms his fear for religious powers. It also serves a philosophical purpose in the sense that it should neutralize any misunderstanding that may arise due to his embrace of fideism. Work Cited Hume, David. [...]

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

Has Hume Refuted the Design Argument?

 Philosophy & literature   |  Humanities/philosophy   |  School essay   |  01/04/2008   |   .doc   |   4 pages

Top sold for educational studies

Legalization of Marijuana

 Social studies   |  Educational studies   |  Case study   |  12/10/2013   |   .doc   |   2 pages

Williams Act and takeover defences in the United States

 Social studies   |  Educational studies   |  Case study   |  05/13/2014   |   .doc   |   2 pages