Search icone
Search and publish your papers
Our Guarantee
We guarantee quality.
Find out more!

Ambiguity of the term “objectivity” in the media

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

General public

About the document

Published date
documents in English
3 pages
General public
0 times
Validated by
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction.
  2. The emergence of popular jounalism.
  3. The introduction of the electronic telegraph.
  4. Impartiality and scientific methods of reporting.
  5. The ideology of impartiality as a duty towards the public.
  6. The authoritarian theory.
  7. The concept of 'Advocacy journalism'.
  8. Objectivity as concept.
  9. Conclusion.
  10. References.

The importance of the concept of objectivity in the media is well attested. Since the beginning of the newspaper press in the early nineteenth Century in the United States and in Europe, rising democracy in the Society has produced various economic, political and technological factors which have led to a neutral and ?non-partisan? reporting. So what does it mean in this context? Objectivity in journalism can be considered as a synonym of neutral point of view; it is a process in which facts are separated from opinions and ideologies. Stories are therefore organized around facts, and the basis is the neutrality of events: in case of conflict, reporters have to present the views of both sides to balance the situation. This essay will also review the progressive evolution of journalism and the rising popularity of the concept of objectivity.

[...] The introduction of the electronic telegraph in the eighteen forties was the first crucial contributory factor for objectivity as a journalists' professional ideal, enabling the development of value and belief systems. This development went on in the eighteen fifties with the emergence of various social clubs and press societies; the Associated Press was also established by six New Yorker newspapers. This monopolistic cooperative's principal objective was to report non-biased facts, as the Head of the AP argued: business is to communicate facts; my instructions do not allow me to make any comment upon the facts which I communicate?. [...]

[...] However, as Nietzsche claimed, pure fact without interpretation can exist?, which means that even if many attempts have been made to establish a purely factual journalism, it is still today very difficult to report in an impartial manner. And this is especially true in the ?non-democratic? systems, where the basic human rights are not respected. Until an international concept of impartiality has been set up for the global media, therefore, the extent to which journalism can be considered as totally objective must remain uncertain. References Books rise of ?objective? news reporting?, in Allan S.: News culture (Course reader) News : the [...]

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

The legitimacy of the International community

 Politics & international   |  International affairs   |  Presentation   |  02/03/2011   |   .doc   |   20 pages

Recent documents in journalism category

Gender and Media : how the TV portray gender ?

 Arts & media   |  Journalism   |  Presentation   |  03/17/2016   |   .doc   |   4 pages

Social Media and the News

 Arts & media   |  Journalism   |  Presentation   |  07/24/2015   |   .doc   |   1 page