Search icone
Search and publish your papers

A research study on performance management system in an organization

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

freelance writer
General public

About the document

Published date
documents in English
term papers
11 pages
General public
0 times
Validated by
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction
  2. Objectives of performance management system
  3. Applicability
  4. Focus on performance management system
  5. Performance measures
    1. Competencies and evaluation
    2. Competencies and ratings
    3. Rating of competencies
    4. Company values and ratings
  6. Questionnaire analysis
  7. Findings
    1. According to employees
  8. Bibliography

A company reviews the existing appraisal system of senior executive levels. The revised performance management system has components of performance planning, monitoring, review and development through involvement of the appraisee is being introduced. The focus of the performance management system for senior executives is to appraise them on different components of managerial responsibilities, consisting of performance, generic managerial competencies, values and potential, totaling to 100 marks. The system provides for the reporting officer (appraiser) and the executive (appraisee) to identify through discussion and agree upon a set of Key Performance Areas (KPAs) in brief at the beginning of the first half-year.

[...] Initiative and Speed: The Executive believes in taking the first step, thinking new and ahead and being swift without compromising on quality; he is creative and innovative and has the willingness to experiment and take risks. E. Total Quality: The Executive believes in pursuing excellence in all spheres of activity; he makes continuous efforts in improving standards of performance, systems and processes. Each value has to be evaluated through discussion on a rating scale of 1 to 5 the rating 1 being the lowest and 5 being the highest. [...]

[...] The aggregate of marks obtained for different KPAs is worked out and indicated as aggregate of IA. Both the Appraisee and the Reporting Officer sign the Part IA. Second half performance The System helps to review the Key Performance Area Targets for the Second Half-Year based on the evaluation of 1st half-year KPAs depending on actual achievements. The reworked KPA targets are briefly recorded, ?Measures' for each KPA defined and Marks allocated. KPAs which extend beyond the 1st half year may be re- recorded in the targets of the 2nd half-year. [...]

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

Performance appraisal system of eMorphosys

 Business & market   |  Marketing   |  Indian project   |  04/19/2009   |   .doc   |   36 pages

A study on stress management

 Business & market   |  Management   |  Thesis   |  04/21/2009   |   .doc   |   67 pages

Top sold for human resources

Andrew Ryan at VC Brakes Case Analysis

 Business & market   |  Human resources   |  Presentation   |  10/09/2015   |   .doc   |   5 pages

American HRM model vs. European HRM model: Is the American model exportable to Europe?

 Business & market   |  Human resources   |  Case study   |  01/15/2009   |   .doc   |   5 pages