Search icone
Search and publish your papers

Why are ASEAN institutions weak and informal? Is this likely to change?

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

Level
General public

About the document

Published date
Language
documents in English
Format
Word
Type
case study
Pages
4 pages
Level
General public
Accessed
4 times
Validated by
Committee Oboolo.com
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction.
  2. Comparison with the European Union.
  3. Reasons for institutional weakness.
  4. The ASEAN political agreements.
  5. Conflicts amongst the Asian nations.
  6. Bibliography.

The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) is generally viewed as the most successful inter-governmental organization in the developing world. This association has grown over the year to include all the countries in Southeast Asia, except the newly independent East Timor. Today, the ASEAN region has a population of about 500 million, a combined gross domestic product of almost 700 billion dollars and a total trade of about 850 billion dollars. The fact remains, however, that multilateral projects have progressed slowly. According to many commentators and analysts, despite ASEAN's undeniable success in international forums, regionalism appears to have fossilized at the initial stages and some hopeful beginnings have even decayed.

[...] In other words, ASEAN have committed to do nothing which could limit their national prerogatives, which, in the context of a regional organization, means to do hardly anything. A weak sense of community within the region and consequently little on which to build institutions tends to make matters worse. This situation is attributable to a wide array of historical factor that have for long divided the region and contributed to undermine any sense of a shared destiny. The experience of colonialism oriented the colonized countries, politically and economically, towards European nations rather than each other. [...]


[...] And on 12 December 2005, ASEAN leaders adopted the landmark Kuala Lumpur declaration, which ?recognizes the importance of having an appropriate institutional framework that is able to meet the challenges of realizing an ASEAN community?. However, as in the past, these commitments seem to derive from pious declarations that do not imply any legal commitment. The new mechanisms do not result from a treaty voted by national parliaments and have not yet been tested. Many analysts argue that it is early days to forecast a positive or negative evolution, but assert that complete de-politicization of the mechanism will be hard. [...]

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

Marketing strategies of IBM Global Service India

 Business & market   |  Marketing   |  Thesis   |  04/16/2009   |   .doc   |   54 pages

A monetary Union in East Asia?

 Politics & international   |  International affairs   |  Presentation   |  09/29/2010   |   .doc   |   21 pages

Top sold for economics

International financial management: Impact of International criminality

 Economics & finance   |  Economics   |  Presentation   |  11/18/2010   |   .doc   |   5 pages

Electronic Commerce and the Purchase Behavior of a French Consumer

 Economics & finance   |  Economics   |  Thesis   |  01/10/2011   |   .doc   |   99 pages