Search icone
Search and publish your papers

Labor market inequality in Canada

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

General public

About the document

Published date
documents in English
term papers
4 pages
General public
0 times
Validated by
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction
  2. Inequalities in the capitalistic system
  3. The post-industrial class structure
  4. Theoretical perspective by Wallace Clement and John Myles
  5. Responses on the human capital perspective
  6. Conclusion
  7. Works cited

When Canada was conceived it was in the early stages of the industrial era, it was an economy that was still a manufacturing based society, it was based on an abundant work force and viable transportation infrastructure. As the nation grew though, it developed into a post-industrial society that experienced a shift toward a knowledge/service driven economy. This has done much to further our society, but has also produced major social inequalities through labor markets and work organizations. This essay will discuss these major social inequalities and will compare the ability of different theoretical perspectives to explain these inequalities, and will comment on the most effective public policy responses. From this it will be clear that Canada's labor market has inequalities that are based on class structure and power relationships, but through proper government intervention, these inequalities can be minimized.

Within our capitalist system, there are vast inequalities, some people earn more than other, some people have more favorable jobs than others, and others do not work at all they just live on investments like real estate.

[...] This classification system that Olin puts forth is very useful as it breaks down the labor market and framework of work organizations and provides a good starting point for explaining the inequalities that exist within these markets. Another theoretical perspective was developed by Wallace Clement and John Myles. They came up with four main classes of individuals based on how much they control the means of production and how much they control the labor of others. These four classes are: the capitalist-executive class which includes self-employed people with three or more employees and managers and executives who have wide-ranging decision making powers; the new middle class which are those who control and manage others; the old middle class which are those who have two or fewer employees; and finally the working class which is the largest group and includes all other labor force participants. [...]

[...] This is occupational status, and while it may not be as important as differences in income, benefits and job security, it is a source of inequality in the labor market. This is important because it plays a large role in creating the self-image that we attach to our jobs. (Krahn & Lowe, 2005: 106). It is typically those of the more socially disadvantaged groups that are those who suffer from the inequalities inherent in the labor market. To get to the bottom of the problem, we must examine the class structure of our society, and from this it will be seen that social class plays a significant role in the workplace inequality. [...]

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

Country Analysis - Canada (2007)

 Economics & finance   |  Economics   |  Market study   |  09/29/2010   |   .pdf   |   36 pages

Business appropriateness in the Mexican food market

 Economics & finance   |  Economics   |  Term papers   |  11/30/2010   |   .doc   |   48 pages

Top sold for economics

International financial management: Impact of International criminality

 Economics & finance   |  Economics   |  Presentation   |  11/18/2010   |   .doc   |   5 pages

Electronic Commerce and the Purchase Behavior of a French Consumer

 Economics & finance   |  Economics   |  Thesis   |  01/10/2011   |   .doc   |   99 pages