Search icone
Search and publish your papers

A “fat tax” to encourage consumers to switch away from fats, sugar and processed foods

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

General public

About the document

Published date
documents in English
4 pages
General public
0 times
Validated by
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction.
  2. The attribute of the ice-cream.
  3. Data to predict the potential effects of a tax on the consumption of ice-cream and vegetables.
  4. Conclusion.
  5. References.

People are obviously getting more and more fat. This fact cannot be denied. That is why, to curb this phenomenon, Kelly Brownell launched the idea of applying a fat tax on unhealthy food, in his article published in the New York Times in 1994. Such a tax could encourage people to buy less unhealthy food. From then on, the point is to analyze the tax features and its effects on general consumption. First, I will focus on the way of applying a new tax on fat products, studying the two goods market, vegetables and ice-cream, presented here. Then I will try to explain what effects the tax could generate on the consumption of these two goods. By doing so, it will help me to show that a fat tax could be a good way to prevent people from buying unhealthy food.

[...] Brownell has proposed two options: either a big tax, between and in order to discourage people from buying junk food, or a smaller one which could help to raise government's revenue. Furthermore, some economists have also proposed to apply the Value Added Tax of 17,5% on fat products.[2] On the other hand, the tax could be applied either on the producer or on the consumer. This is a tricky decision, because if the tax is applied on the producer, hence it could absorb a part of the tax by reducing the price sell its extra supply-, would undermine the efficiency of a fat tax. [...]

[...] On the other hand, ice-cream can also be a necessity when the income-elasticity is positive: in this case, the demand for ice-cream must rise in a smaller proportion of people's income, which is to say between 0 and 1. This is also called a normal good. But considering these two cases, does it mean that ice-cream is a necessity? Assuming that richer people spend a smaller proportion of their income on ice-cream than poorer people, it first means that their budget share devoted to ice-cream will fall. [...]

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

Chocolate industry in India

 Business & market   |  Business strategy   |  Thesis   |  05/06/2009   |   .doc   |   49 pages

Business plan: Give me 5

 Business & market   |  Management   |  Thesis   |  09/29/2010   |   .doc   |   41 pages

Recent documents in government finance category

Taxation limits on local governments; municipalities and school districts in the state of Georgia

 Economics & finance   |  Government finance   |  Presentation   |  07/24/2015   |   .doc   |   9 pages

In your opinion what was the primary cause of the financial crisis/recession of 2008-2009?

 Economics & finance   |  Government finance   |  Case study   |  06/10/2013   |   .doc   |   3 pages