Search icone
Search and publish your papers

Hitler’s rise to power

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

General public

About the document

Published date
documents in English
case study
6 pages
General public
0 times
Validated by
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction
  2. Post-World War I Germany
  3. Weimar Republic
  4. Political instabilities
  5. Hitler's unprecedented usage of propaganda
  6. Hitler's natural leadership

Post-World War I Germany was a country ridden with resentment, distress and desperation. There was confusion throughout the country because many thought that they had won the war, therefore the harsh terms of the Treaty of Versailles came as a shock to most German citizens. War guilt was a source of major bitterness in Germany and caused it to resent its neighbors deeply. There were also great economic issues arising from Versailles with seemingly impossible reparations needing to be paid by the losing state of the War. The Treaty also attacked German Tradition greatly by limiting its military significantly which caused outrage in the country.

The political instability that ascended from all of these factors was unavoidable. The Weimar Republic was established in 1919, after the German Revolutions in the November of 1918, to replace the imperial form of government in Germany. This Republic attempted to spread liberal democracies in Germany, which was soon proved a difficult task. The Weimar Republic was fragile and insecure from its inception, and with the creation of many extremist groups that outright defied it, this new government was doomed to fail. One of these extremist parties was the National Socialist, or the Nazis. Adolf Hitler joined the Nazis in 1919 when it was one of the smallest parties at the time because he had similar views with these right-wing thinkers.

Hitler decided to become a politician after the German Collapse in 1918, as he describes in his infamous book Mein Kampf. Hitler was quickly recognized as a striking public speaker and a ?master of the masses' He appealed to the emotions and desperation of a distraught nation with his powerful and commanding speeches that captivated thousands. When Hitler joined the Nazis in 1919 there were a mere seven members, this number rose to 27,000 followers in 1925 and then an impressive one million followers by 1932. As the party grew, so did Hitler's power. Soon he was one of the most influential men in Germany which surprised everybody, even himself. Hitler's rise to chancellery in 1933 was propelled by his charismatic and confident leadership and permissible by the failure of the Weimar Republic which paved the way for one of the most devastating dictatorships in history.

[...] "The Sources of Hitler's Power." The Review of Politics, 1942: 379-408. Heiden, Konrad. Der Fuehrer: Hitler's Rise to Power. Germany: Gollancz (Gurian, The Sources of Hitler's Power, 1942) Roberts, Professor S.H. "The Rise of Hitlerism." The Australian Quarterly, 1933: 57-68. [...]

[...] He knew that the citizens of Germany were unstable and confused, thus to gain their loyalty he gave them scapegoats to mask their own failures and the failure of Germany. Hitler moved his audiences into an unbalanced fury towards the Treaty of Versailles, Jews, Communists, Southerners as well as most foreigners.[30] He would blame them for their losses in World War I and the continued disaster in Germany. He utilized the ?stab in the back theory' to denounce the legitimacy of the current Republic by saying its incapacity let the operation of Jewish forces be successful.[31] Hitler also claimed that the Republic did not have the will for victory and did not know how to control the masses as he did.[32] This put the on the enemy line which influenced people to put their confidence in Hitler when the Republic was failing. [...]

[...] It is said that the Nazis completely fragmented society by replacing real ideas with emotional appeals, real authority with charisma, and real security with loose promises.[52] His platform may have seemed as though it was for the good of the individuals, it was actually in the interest of the ruler on the path for power. While Hitler attempted to evoke feelings of security and confidence in his leadership over that of the fragile Weimar Republic, his Third Reich in fact caused greater insecurity worldwide that was ever thought possible. Hitler's regime was vastly more deceptive and tyrannical than the Republics', of which he accused of being those very things. [...]

[...] Hitler's natural leadership and ability to move masses did not go unnoticed by other extremist leaders at the time. His oratory skills were seen as an indispensable tool in Nazi campaigns and are what allowed him to rise through the ranks at such a great velocity.[46] Hudenberg was the first to recognize Hitler's capabilities and used him to attract masses and garner the popularity which he could not.[47] He was not seen as an independent man at this point, but rather a tool to agitate masses and prevent the spread of communism.[48] This role as a puppet for the Republic proved to be beneficial for Hitler as they did not see him as a threat and therefore was not contained whatsoever.[49] In his under the radar position, he was able to more carefully prepare his plans and gain such a momentum that would have otherwise been halted by the more powerful leaders. [...]

[...] Germany: Gollancz Neumann, Franz Leopold. Behemoth: The Structure and Practice of National Socialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press Roberts, Professor S.H. "The Rise of Hitlerism." The Australian Quarterly, 1933: 57-68. Gurian, Waldemar. [...]

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

Hitler and the impact of his adverse acts

 History & geography   |  Modern history   |  Term papers   |  11/25/2009   |   .doc   |   6 pages

What factors account for Hitler's rise to power?

 History & geography   |  Modern history   |  Presentation   |  09/29/2010   |   .doc   |   1 page

Recent documents in ancient history category

Trade, Merchants and the Lost Cities of the Bronze Age - Gojko Barjamovic, Thomas Chaney, Kerem...

 History & geography   |  Ancient history   |  Research papers   |  06/11/2018   |   .doc   |   4 pages

Greece vs. Persian Empire

 History & geography   |  Ancient history   |  Presentation   |  01/30/2017   |   .doc   |   4 pages