Search icone
Search and publish your papers

Is the adversarial system of criminal procedure more or less effective than an inquisitorial system in finding out the truth about an alleged offence? Advantages and disadvantages of adversarial and inquisitorial criminal procedure

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

Level
Expert

About the document

Published date
Language
documents in English
Format
Word
Type
presentations
Pages
7 pages
Level
Expert
Accessed
1 times
Validated by
Committee Oboolo.com
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Finding out the truth, a premium in the inquisitorial system
    1. A premium in both pure inquisitorial and mixed systems
    2. A risk for judicial errors in the adversarial system
    3. Objectivity, equality and equity
    4. An impartial decision
    5. A written procedure
    6. Finding out the truth, the society's interest
  2. Advocacy in favour the adoption of some aspects and characteristics of adversarial criminal procedure in France
  3. Advocacy in favour the adoption of some aspects and characteristics of inquisitorial criminal procedure in Australia
    1. A pre-trial court
    2. The standard of proof
    3. A code of criminal procedure

As early as 1866, Faustin Helie, a French judge and legal author, underlined the idea of a necessary equilibrium between the interests of the society (which needs to be protected from infringements) and the interests of the accused persons (whose rights must be totally guaranteed) in the criminal procedure. The aim of protecting society's interests in criminal procedure seems to be contradictory with the necessary protection of individual rights. Nevertheless, a modern criminal procedure system tries to conciliate those interests into an adequate system. For that reason, in countries such as Australia or France, the question of how to reform criminal procedure is arising but the arguments differ as Australia is a common law country and France is a civil law country with some differences in law traditions. In a criminal procedure, two different basic systems can be defined: the accusatorial or the adversarial system and the inquisitorial system. The adversarial system is defined as "The common law system of trial which requires one party, usually the plaintiff or the prosecution, to collect evidence and present it to a judge to prove a cause of action or charge against another party who has to refute or defend.?

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

English legal system: The Sources of English Law

 Law & contracts   |  Constitutional   |  Course material   |  09/29/2010   |   .doc   |   87 pages

English Legal System : The Administration of England and Wales

 Law & contracts   |  Other law subjects   |  Course material   |  09/29/2010   |   .doc   |   93 pages

Recent documents in criminal law category

American police history

 Law & contracts   |  Criminal   |  Presentation   |  01/11/2017   |   .doc   |   1 page

Managerial Economics: Welfare Corporate Social Responsibility

 Law & contracts   |  Criminal   |  Case study   |  05/13/2015   |   .doc   |   5 pages