Search icone
Search and publish your papers

Underground Egoism

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

General public

About the document

Published date
documents in English
book reviews
3 pages
General public
1 times
Validated by
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction
  2. Acting strictly according to the will in the moment
  3. Cases for his growth
  4. Conclusion
  5. Works cited

Dostoevsky's Underground Man is an attempt to offer an example of the true result of egoism, as opposed to the rational egoism of Western European Enlightenment literature. It became the intellectual fashion at this time to believe that natural law was the only law, and that if men acted according to what was in their natural best interests, society would be better off. With Notes From Underground, Dostoevsky sought to fight against the moral corruption of the Russian people by these naturalist European theories. The Underground Man is a true egoist who makes full use of the free will that the rational egoists deny, and because of that is shown to be morally reprehensible. I think it is a mistake to read the Underground Man as being in intellectual agreement with the rational egoists, with emotional contradictions. It seems to me that he feels his form of egoism to be truer and fuller than the form represented by the ?good men? who (claim to) act according to the laws of nature. Even a man as sick and wicked as the Underground Man wouldn't be believably human unless he had a moral conscience, even if he doesn't behave according to it.

[...] If the character of the rational egoist is the good, decent, of action,? the Underground Man is incapable of emulating because that form of egoism is a false, or impossible trait, then the Underground Man represents the form that egoism would actually take in most men. Egoism is here shown to turn men into vile, spiteful, despicable, mentally crippled creatures who hurt themselves and those around them for no practical purpose. He has isolated himself out of shame and contempt, (of himself and others), because isolation is an easier option than change. [...]

[...] Though it may appear that Dostoevsky is using a similar tactic, he is not using the confession of the Underground Man as a fleeting anecdote. The Liza story takes up quite a bit of the total work, and has had a profounder effect on the Underground Man than Marion had on Rousseau. Further, while Rousseau uses his confession of his crime against Marion as a method for justifying other aspects of himself, and even comes to characterize it as not a crime at all, the Underground Man uses every opportunity available in his confession to take full personal responsibility for his crime against Liza, while exploring and deploring his motivations during every step of his crime. [...]

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

Irrational Underground Man

 Philosophy & literature   |  Literature   |  School essay   |  10/05/2007   |   .doc   |   4 pages

Strategic issues of the Chinese cinema

 Arts & media   |  Film studies   |  Thesis   |  02/03/2011   |   .doc   |   54 pages

Top sold for humanities/philosophy

A Comparison of Zen and Shin Buddhism: Dogen VS Shinran

 Philosophy & literature   |  Humanities/philosophy   |  School essay   |  10/23/2007   |   .doc   |   3 pages

Descartes' meditation two proofs of God and how humans make mistakes

 Philosophy & literature   |  Humanities/philosophy   |  Presentation   |  09/18/2015   |   .doc   |   2 pages