Search icone
Search and publish your papers

Thinking This Hard Hurts

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

 
Level
General public
Study
political...
School/University
Rutgers

About the document

Published date
Language
documents in English
Format
Word
Type
presentations
Pages
3 pages
Level
General public
Accessed
0 times
Validated by
Committee Oboolo.com
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction
  2. The man's acceptance of the doorkeeper's assertions
  3. K.'s greatest error
  4. The semi-conscious state in which K. lives
  5. Conclusion
  6. Works cited

Joseph K. is in trouble, and he doesn't know why. Accused of a crime the details of which he is not privy to, his life becomes one impossible search for an acquittal. All his energies are throwing into determining his crime and a way to prove his innocence, but ultimately his efforts are in vain and he perishes at the hands of the court. The way in which K. leads his life during the trial determines what end he meets. A priest offers him some advice in the form of a parable, but K. fails to recognize the relevancy of it to his own life. The parable of the doorkeeper illustrates that meaning, in any sense of the term, must be drawn directly from an individual's choices; there is no greater or ultimate meaning to any individual's life, or anything in one's life, beyond that which one gives it.

[...] The answers to these questions are not as important as the act of asking the questions themselves, but the conclusions that one draws from them require a radical shift in one's thinking. Barrett elaborates: The individual is thrust out of the sheltered nest that society has provided. He can no longer hide his nakedness by the old disguises. He learns how much of what he has taken for granted was by its own nature neither eternal nor necessary but thoroughly temporal and contingent. [...]


[...] Just as the man seeking the Law gives the Law undue meaning and is unaware of his error, K. gives the court and his trial undue influence over his life by the choices he makes pertaining to them. K.'s greatest error is in his choice to indulge the court and his trial as salient, effective forces, when in reality they have only as much power as he gives them. From the first time K. is introduced to the agents of the court, they do not limit his actions or make life-altering demands of him. [...]

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

Feral women: Female characters in Wuthering Heights, The Moonstone, and Hard Times

 Philosophy & literature   |  Literature   |  Presentation   |  09/25/2008   |   .doc   |   10 pages

East London love story

 Philosophy & literature   |  Literature   |  Term papers   |  08/03/2009   |   .doc   |   112 pages

Top sold for humanities/philosophy

Longing For HER: Ferlinghetti's Mad Quest for the Muse

 Philosophy & literature   |  Humanities/philosophy   |  School essay   |  11/04/2007   |   .doc   |   3 pages

An essay outlining David Chalmers 'The Matrix as Metaphysics' hypothesis

 Philosophy & literature   |  Humanities/philosophy   |  Research papers   |  01/27/2009   |   .doc   |   7 pages