Search icone
Search and publish your papers
Our Guarantee
We guarantee quality.
Find out more!

To Exist Is to Question Existence Itself

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

Student
Level
Advanced
Study
literature
School/University
Emerson...

About the document

Published date
Language
documents in English
Format
Word
Type
school essay
Pages
3 pages
Level
Advanced
Accessed
1 times
Validated by
Committee Oboolo.com
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction
  2. The main difference between a documentary and other forms of writing
  3. The first choice a documentarian makes
  4. A documentary without emotional input
  5. The power of the documentarian
  6. Conclusion
  7. Bibliography


Writers define themselves by their purposes. A novelist writes to entertain, to embrace the imagination and create a world of escape for the reader. A columnist writes to inform, to relay the facts and describe a world of current events for the reader. What, however, exists in-between? With such a large gray area between truth and untruth, surely some writers thrive upon this ambiguity, writers who can both relay the facts and create the world in which these facts exist. These writers are documentarians, individuals who have found that balance between fiction and nonfiction, who do not lie but are fastidious about the truth they tell. And in their actions and in their desires, they have formulated firsthand the definition of a documentary; for a documentary strives not to answer the questions previously conceived by society, but strives instead to devise its own questions for society to answer itself.

[...] Still, even with its Oscar for Documentary of the Year, Bowling for Columbine is not the ideal example of a documentary, for at times Moore raises too many issues, takes his film in too many directions, and forgets to direct his reasoning toward a final point, a final question. Although it comes short of developing the questions a documentary should ask, Bowling for Columbine does embody the overall essence of one. At the end of the film, the viewer is left with a hatred of guns, with a hatred of the NRA and Charlton Heston and any individual who has ever picked up a gun and shot the brains out of the back of someone's head. [...]


[...] This idea and focus of the documentarian, this thing he experienced and wishes to share, is filtered through his awareness into his very own truth (Coles 177). A truth that he will do anything to make another believe, for in communicating this truth to one person or to a theater full of anxious viewers, the documentary's purpose has been fulfilled. This purpose is a purpose of questions and answers, of truths and manipulation; it is a game where the documentarian is the king and the audience merely pawns. [...]

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

Existence value: The theoretical case for and against its use in cost benefit analysis

 Economics & finance   |  Economics   |  Term papers   |  04/05/2009   |   .doc   |   16 pages

Asking questions about the popular sphere, media and democracy.

 Arts & media   |  Journalism   |  Term papers   |  04/29/2009   |   .doc   |   7 pages

Top sold for humanities/philosophy

An essay outlining David Chalmers 'The Matrix as Metaphysics' hypothesis

 Philosophy & literature   |  Humanities/philosophy   |  Research papers   |  01/27/2009   |   .doc   |   7 pages

Agamemnon vs. Abraham: Universality vs. individuality

 Philosophy & literature   |  Humanities/philosophy   |  Term papers   |  07/31/2009   |   .doc   |   3 pages