Search icone
Search and publish your papers

Parfit’s View of Personal Identity and Human Behavior

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

Graduate Student
Level
Advanced
Study
literature
School/University
University...

About the document

Published date
Language
documents in English
Format
Word
Type
presentations
Pages
2 pages
Level
Advanced
Accessed
2 times
Validated by
Committee Oboolo.com
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction
  2. The implications of Parfit's concept of persons
    1. Substantive self and human behavior
    2. The fear of death
  3. The case of our prison system
  4. Conclusion
  5. Works cited

I intend to explicate Derek Parfit's view regarding personal identity as nothing more than non-branching psychological continuity. I will be brief in my discussion to avoid redundancy, as I have more deeply explicated Parfit's infamous view in my previous paper, ?Parfit's View of Personal Identity.? Further, I will discuss the vast implications of Parfit's view of persons as a series of psychologically continuous selves related by differing degrees of psychological connectedness. I will defend Parfit's identification of psychological continuity as the criterion for personal identity. However, in defending the basic theory, I will argue that the psychologically continuous successive selves that constitute a person will typically never be as distantly related as Parfit implies. Therefore, I will argue further that the prevailing beliefs of persons that Parfit himself identifies as susceptible to his view are in fact mostly compatible with his view, and therefore, additional evidence for a Parfitian view of personal identity.

[...] This is highly irrational and should be further weakened, if it is prevalent, with acceptance of Parfit's view of personal identity. However, Parfit excessively discounts the role of instinct in this irrational fear. The will to survive must be among the most powerful instincts of all organisms. To some extent, controlling the fear of death may simply be beyond our rational powers, no matter what we profess to believe about the nature of our existence. In our transition to a survival-by-degrees view of the nature of persons, the emotions that Parfit worries will be weakened will survive in a similar degree. [...]


[...] The implications of Parfit's view of the nature of persons are greatly unsettling and even disturbing. However, I believe that we can retain many of our qualities that Parfit fears we may lose under his theory of the nature of persons-especially ?loyalty to, or love of, other particular selves?- while accepting the nature of persons as psychologically continuous successive selves of varying relation (?Personal Identity? 181). The key involves the matters of degree in which survival consists. Parfit implies that there exist great disparities in degrees of psychological connectedness among the selves that constitute a person. [...]

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

Parfit's View of Personal Identity

 Philosophy & literature   |  Linguistics   |  Presentation   |  08/07/2007   |   .doc   |   2 pages

The Third Way by Anthony Giddens

 Philosophy & literature   |  Humanities/philosophy   |  Book review   |  05/17/2009   |   .doc   |   7 pages

Recent documents in linguistics category

Countable and uncountable nouns

 Philosophy & literature   |  Linguistics   |  Summaries   |  03/29/2016   |   .doc   |   3 pages

Native English speakers of the world

 Philosophy & literature   |  Linguistics   |  Presentation   |  07/27/2015   |   .doc   |   3 pages