Search icone
Search and publish your papers
Our Guarantee
We guarantee quality.
Find out more!

Homer’s epic poem, The Iliad

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

 
Level
General public
Study
internation...
School/University
University...

About the document

Published date
Language
documents in English
Format
Word
Type
presentations
Pages
3 pages
Level
General public
Accessed
4 times
Validated by
Committee Oboolo.com
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction
  2. The difference between Achilles and Hektor
  3. The diversity of the reasons for the actions they take
  4. The heroes fated to die
  5. Conclusion

Homer's epic poem, The Iliad, creates two very distinct heroic figures: Achilles and Hektor. These men come from different backgrounds and have different reasons for fighting in the Trojan War; Achilles fights for honor, whereas Hektor fights to defend his city, and yet both know that if they fight, they are fated to die. Because of their differing motives for engaging in warfare, both characters have distinct traits and factors that shape their views of honor and their fates. Achilles places personal honor above the group; he believes that if he chooses to fight and to die in this war, it will be on his own terms. For Achilles, honor and anger drive most of his actions. However, Hektor fights to protect his people, and to defend his city's honor; Hektor, in general, focuses more on the group and is more concerned with the well-being of his people than with his own safety. Nevertheless, despite their many differences, The Iliad proves that neither of these men are lesser or greater heroes, and that none of their traits are absolute: at times Achilles is selfless and vulnerable, whereas Hektor can be self-centered and individualistic. Homer uses these complex characters to explore heroic figures and to illustrate that there is not one archetype for a hero.

[...] In Book one, Achilles says, ?Zeus of the loud thunder on Olympos should grant me honour at least. But now he has given me not even a little. Now the son of Atreus, powerful Agamemnon, has dishonoured me, since he has taken away my prize and keeps (Lattimore, The Iliad, 353-56) Agamemnon slights Achilles, and Achilles feels like his honor has been lessened in the eyes of the Greeks; he also feels that the gods should not have allowed this to happen. [...]


[...] Throughout most of the epic poem, Achilles is driven by anger and the need to protect his honor. Achilles refuses to fight during the most difficult time for the Greeks because his anger toward Agamemnon has not been sated. In book nine, Odysseus, Phoinix, and Aias come to Achilles with gifts from Agamemnon to try to convince him to rejoin the battle. However, Achilles does not want the gifts, he wants Agamemnon to apologize because to him, only after Agamemnon humbles himself will Achilles regain his honor. [...]

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

One Thousand Years of the English Epic

 Philosophy & literature   |  Literature   |  School essay   |  09/26/2007   |   .doc   |   2 pages

The Humanity of the Greek Gods

 Philosophy & literature   |  Linguistics   |  Presentation   |  04/18/2008   |   .doc   |   3 pages

Top sold for literature

Poem analysis: A Mate Can Do No Wrong by Henry Lawson

 Philosophy & literature   |  Literature   |  Case study   |  01/29/2014   |   .doc   |   3 pages

The "Sondergut" of the Gospel of Luke

 Philosophy & literature   |  Literature   |  Case study   |  05/15/2014   |   .doc   |   7 pages