Search icone
Search and publish your papers

The plot against people: Critical analysis

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

 
Level
General public
Study
geology
School/University
ACC

About the document

Published date
Language
documents in English
Format
Word
Type
term papers
Pages
3 pages
Level
General public
Accessed
10 times
Validated by
Committee Oboolo.com
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction
  2. The plot against people
  3. Baker's primary purpose
  4. Comedy as dominating feature
  5. The primary mode
  6. The secondary mode
  7. Conclusion

In ?The Plot Against People,? Russell Baker writes about inanimate objects and the three major categories they can be classified in; those that don't work (A), those that break down (B), and those that get lost (C). The way this essay works is that Baker describes various objects with broad comic irony, which make this piece an enjoyable read (where its mock-serious tone is part of what he's making fun of-the human desire to explain all phenomena) Baker attributes inanimate objects a human ambition, with characteristics like ire and defiance saying it is their ultimate goal to defeat and resist mankind. ?The Plot Against People,? is effective by using everyday examples of the things people do but blame inanimate objects for, to make fun of the scientific community's outlook on everything being caused by scientific reasons and fitting neatly into a box. One Baker topic sentence about things that never work begins with, ?Science is utterly baffled by the entire category? (2).

[...] in the eyes of the reader as human antagonists. And with this creation, perhaps another aim is achieved by helping society realize that inanimate objects aren't in fact plotting against man, but it is man himself who fails, not things. Baker's primary purpose is a literary one because of the comic purpose and satirical tone he uses. It is followed closely by a persuasive purpose displaying his intention to convince the audience of his rationality that objects are out to get people. [...]


[...] By placing the word in the verb tense, he is suggesting both action of inanimate objects ?resisting and at the same time drawing upon the pretend scientific logic of his established tone. Baker, once again, achieves the comic effect he strives for so well in the clever and humorous way he phrases this essay. Description is another one of Baker's effective modes, by stressing the uniqueness of each category of inanimate objects explored in Plot Against People.? Baker carefully describes three objects, is not uncommon for a pair of pliers to climb all the way from the cellar to the attic in its single-minded determination to raise its owner's blood pressure. [...]

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

Critical analysis of The Passion of the Christ and The Da Vinci Code

 Arts & media   |  Film studies   |  Presentation   |  06/17/2008   |   .doc   |   4 pages

Death as reality: A response to Christopher S. Glover's critical analysis of Don DeLillo's...

 Philosophy & literature   |  Literature   |  Term papers   |  08/24/2010   |   .doc   |   4 pages

Top sold for literature

Rise to Globalism: American Foreign Policy Since 1938

 Philosophy & literature   |  Literature   |  Book review   |  07/08/2013   |   .pdf   |   2 pages

Comedy in Chaucer's Canterbury Tales: 'Moral' Pilgrims and the Stories They Tell

 Philosophy & literature   |  Literature   |  Presentation   |  05/22/2008   |   .doc   |   6 pages