Search icone
Search and publish your papers

The budgetary implication of the European Union’s May 2004 enlargement

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author


About the document

Published date
documents in English
5 pages
0 times
Validated by
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction.
  2. The new balance.
  3. Agenda 2000.
  4. The financial framework 2007-2013.
    1. Structure of the financial framework 2007-2013.
  5. Conclusion.
  6. Bibliography.

On 1 May 2004 Europe celebrates the entrance of ten new members in the European Union but behind the fireworks and the celebrations, Brussels has to adapt itself to this new generation of the European project. One of the most important points is the budgetary issue. History has shown that the budget is a source of tension between the members and everybody keeps in mind the 1965 crisis when De Gaulle withdrew France from its participation in the work of the Council of the Ministers in protest at a proposal from the commission concerning the financing of the Community's budget (George & Bache, 2000). The budget of the European Union finances the operations of the EU institution and the EU policies. It is defined by an agreement between all the member states. The expenditures are voted on by the parliament and the Council according to the draft budget submitted by the Commission.

[...] The European authorities only looked at the potential growth of these countries but did not realize their huge needs (maybe because of the pre-adhesion funds). The European Union understood it only when they saw the offensive behaviour of the new member states. This attitude of the newcomers has changed the mentality of the Fifteen. The budgetary negotiations have always been rude but we have seen for the financial framework 2007-2013 that everyone tried to keep its advantages and that the common interest was easily forgotten. [...]

[...] The new balance One of the most important budgetary implications of the May 2004 enlargement is the fact that all the newcomers need the European subsidies as it is seen on this table. Before the enlargement only four countries were net beneficiaries and benefited a lot from the European Union. The net beneficiary countries are now more numerous than the net contributors. Even if the political weight of the beneficiaries is still low, the EU could be inclined to be in crisis because of the different interests. [...]

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

The integration of the European Union

 Politics & international   |  European union   |  Term papers   |  01/15/2006   |   .doc   |   6 pages

To what extent has Europe benefited from a "peace dividend" through the European Union and its...

 Politics & international   |  European union   |  Presentation   |  01/15/2009   |   .doc   |   4 pages

Recent documents in european union category

The real power of the British Royal Family

 Politics & international   |  European union   |  Presentation   |  06/14/2016   |   .pdf   |   7 pages

Economic changes after the 2008 Crisis: Impact on the Scottish people's opinion regarding...

 Politics & international   |  European union   |  Presentation   |  05/09/2016   |   .doc   |   17 pages