Search icone
Search and publish your papers

“Britain for and against Europe”, by David Baker & David Seawright

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

Level
Advanced

About the document

Published date
Language
documents in English
Format
Word
Type
presentations
Pages
5 pages
Level
Advanced
Accessed
0 times
Validated by
Committee Oboolo.com
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction.
  2. The European Issue in British Politics by Andrew Gamble.
  3. The big influence is The United States.
  4. A 'Rosy' map of Europe? Labour parliaments and European integration by David Baker and David Seawright.
  5. The authors' attempt to examine the principles and the history of the party.
  6. This harsh opposition to European integration.
  7. The second part of The British Conservatives and Europe.
  8. Conclusion.

This study, by a group of important political thinkers, provides an analysis of the often problematic relationship between Britain and the European Union. The book opens with a general review of the history of this relationship since 1950. This is followed by ten chapters by other researchers, each investigating a particular aspect of the relationship, the view of Britain from Europe, Business, the Civil Service, and the Trade Unions. It also discusses the attitude of the media and different political parties in England, Scotland and Wales. The book is also a scrutiny of the attitude of the media.In the introduction, Baker and Seawright explain the complexity of the relation that Britain entertains with the European Union. This relation was marked by tension mainly because of Britain that the author describes as ?the reluctant European partner' . After this they provide readers with a brief idea of the ten chapters. All chapters deal with the British European relation but each deal with a specific aspect of it. The first chapter ?The European Issue in British Politics? by Andrew Gamble provides a historical review of the integration of Britain in the European Union. The issue of integration in the Union itself is very specific since it raises questions of sovereignty and identity that the British can not answer: ?Europe is this kind of issue. It divides parties because it fuses together issues of sovereignty and identity with political economy in a novel and powerful way.? As Gamble explains, the issue is so complex that it raises all sorts of controversies within British politicians. Yet, the complexity of the issue is not the only explanation for the uneasiness that marks the relation between Europe and Britain. In fact, there is the way with which Britain views Europe that affects the relation as well as the influence of the United States of America.

[...] Secondly, there is the set of legislative initiatives produced by the Thatcher's government that was largely for European integration. The seventh chapter, ?British Business: managing complexity? by Justin Greenwood and Lara Stancich deals with the relation between Europe and British Business. In fact, this latter is positive to Europe: ?There is scarcely any doubt that British Business, like its counterparts in the Continent, is positive to Europe.?[13] Here again the most important element that generates this positive attitude is the wish to benefit from the European Common Market. [...]


[...] As the writers say several occasions, Liberal Democrat support helped Major's government to carry the day.'[6] The natural conclusion that they draw after mentioning all the examples that prove that Liberal Democrats played an important role in shaping the policy of Britain towards Europe is the following: short, in the absence of Liberal support, Britain might never have joined the common Market in the first place.'[7] Then the authors try to examine the principles and the history of the party in order to see if they contain elements that explain this enthusiasm for the European common market. [...]


[...] TUC regarded Europe in relation to the economic benefits it would bring to British industry: TUC's leadership (General Council) tended to frame European question in terms of the economic costs and benefits which might be associated with the EC and with certain developments at the European level.?[10] Trade Union Congress was for Europe while Trade Unions rejected it: TUC's self-consciously ?pragmatic' stance was challenged by a coalition of unions hostile to British membership of the EC and to a lesser extent by a smaller group which took a dramatically opposed view.?[11] This harsh opposition to European integration existed because these anti- Europe groups saw in it a menace to the sovereignty of Britain: ?Concerns for the decision- making autonomy of the British Parliament were developed into elaborate defences of sovereignty?[12] The pro-Europe group saw in it an opportunity to have access to a large market. [...]

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

Why did Britain not become a leading member of the European Union and why is it sometimes...

 Politics & international   |  European union   |  Presentation   |  09/29/2010   |   .doc   |   26 pages

Top sold for international relations

How do the Federal Republic of Germany, Fifth Republic France and post-war Italy fulfil the...

 Politics & international   |  International affairs   |  Presentation   |  01/12/2009   |   .doc   |   4 pages

An evaluation of constructivism as an approach to international relations theory

 Politics & international   |  International affairs   |  Presentation   |  09/29/2010   |   .doc   |   11 pages