Search icone
Search and publish your papers

Nationalist movements that took place in the Philippines, Indonesia and Vietnam in an effort to overthrow colonial rule

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

General public

About the document

Published date
documents in English
4 pages
General public
1 times
Validated by
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction
  2. The Philippines
  3. Indonesia
  4. Vietnam
  5. Conclusions

A little known history professor once argued that the colonization that took place in Southeast Asia during the nineteenth century occurred in fundamentally the same manner. Colonial powers entered the country, subjugated the local people and exploited valuable resources for economic and political gain. In response, each nation rose up to throw off Western rulers. Although the professor's hypothesis is one that attempts to succinctly encapsulate the period of colonialism that occurred in Southeast Asia, the reality is that the development and evolution of colonialism as described by this professor was not as cohesive as this hypothesis makes it sound. In fact, as noted by SarDesai (1997) ?The impact of colonial rule on the people varied from unashamedly exploitative to the benign and benevolent. It generated forces of industrialization, urbanization, modernization, intellectual ferment, and political ambition that inspired at least a small elite in each colony to abandon part of the traditional trappings and step into the modern age? (p. 141).With the realization that colonialism did not have a uniform impact on the development and evolution of countries in Southeast Asia, there is a clear impetus to examine some of the differences that manifested during this time period. To this end, this investigation considers the nationalist movements that took place in the Philippines, Indonesia and Vietnam in an effort to overthrow colonial rule.

[...] The Philippines Critically reviewing what has been written about the struggle of the Philippines to gain its independence from colonial rule, it seems reasonable to argue that the Western powers that played such a role in the subjugation of the state were ultimately the ones that afforded the country the ability to become free and independent. In the early years of the country's development, the Philippines were ruled by the Spanish. Although the Filipinos were dissatisfied with this situation, the problem became exacerbated when the US brokered a deal with the Spanish that left America in charge of the state. [...]

[...] While SarDesai notes that process was due in part to the nationalist sentiment which served as the basis for the development of government in the post-War years, the author also notes that pressure on the French government to end its war in Vietnam also played a role in the independence of Vietnam. ?French forces were thoroughly demoralized, particularly by the public opinion at home, which overwhelmingly pressed for ending the "dirty war." Cabinets fell rapidly until Pierre Mendes- France, who became premier on June vowed to resign his office if a settlement on Indochina were not reached by July 20, 1954? (p. [...]

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

America's war in Vietnam

 History & geography   |  Modern history   |  Presentation   |  09/29/2010   |   .doc   |   21 pages

Top sold for international relations

How useful is the term "New terrorism" in distinguishing -9/11 post terrorism from the form that...

 Politics & international   |  International affairs   |  Presentation   |  09/29/2010   |   .doc   |   7 pages

An evaluation of constructivism as an approach to international relations theory

 Politics & international   |  International affairs   |  Presentation   |  09/29/2010   |   .doc   |   11 pages