Search icone
Search and publish your papers

The Political and Economic Policies of Russia and China

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

research
Level
General public
Study
accounting
School/University
westminster

About the document

Published date
Language
documents in English
Format
Word
Type
presentations
Pages
6 pages
Level
General public
Accessed
0 times
Validated by
Committee Oboolo.com
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction
  2. China and Russia before the Fall of Communism
  3. Economic Transformation after the fall of Communism
  4. Russia's Economic Model
  5. China's Economic Model
  6. Comparing China and Russia
  7. Conclusion

Introduction

At the end of World War II, the international community became notably divided upon political and economic lines. While many countries in the West chose a capitalist democracy many in the East had chosen communism/Marxism as the central means for social development. Although both of these systems clearly have some merit, capitalism and democracy were able to triumph as communism fell in the early 1990s. With the fall of communism came the realization that the communist economic system would no longer work. As such, formerly communist countries had to officially enter the free market in an effort to rebuild their economies. Even though formerly communist states had shared similar ideals with respect to political and economic development, when it came to entering the free market, each state developed notably different policies for achieving international economic integration. Such is the case with China and Russia.

[...] Although the answer seems quite evident overall, the staunch adherence of the Chinese and Russian governments to the tenets of communism may serve as the basis to prevent this evolution for a number of decades. Thus, the ideological establishment of communism in the context of these countries becomes more evident. Until leaders are able to see beyond these issues, they will be limited in their ability to achieve stable economies. References Breslin, S.G. (1996). China: Developmental state of dysfunctional development. [...]


[...] Karatnycky goes on to note that the paradox of what has occurred in Russia can be easily explicated if one is willing to look beyond the surface and analyze the impact the new policies developed by the government have had on the development of the economy in Russia. According to Karatnycky, the reason why Russia has not seen stunning growth in terms of economic development stems from the fact that the government has not moved toward policies that would allow for the full development of capitalism in the state. [...]


[...] rapid development of urban areas, in fact, has widened the economic gap between the newly rich urbanites and the peasants? (p. 10). As such, many of China's farmers are finding it difficult to survive under these conditions. Although Chu does note that many farmers are better off now than under the reforms made by Mao, the reality of poverty and blight is quite common among this population. The second problem being experienced by the Chinese in terms of economic development is the unwillingness of the government to relinquish bureaucratic control of certain industries. [...]

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

China in Africa: Political or Economic Interest?

 Politics & international   |  International affairs   |  Presentation   |  09/29/2010   |   .doc   |   4 pages

Business Environment: China

 Economics & finance   |  Economics   |  Term papers   |  11/24/2010   |   .pdf   |   5 pages

Top sold for international relations

How do the Federal Republic of Germany, Fifth Republic France and post-war Italy fulfil the...

 Politics & international   |  International affairs   |  Presentation   |  01/12/2009   |   .doc   |   4 pages

An evaluation of constructivism as an approach to international relations theory

 Politics & international   |  International affairs   |  Presentation   |  09/29/2010   |   .doc   |   11 pages