Search icone
Search and publish your papers

International organisations and sovereignty

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author


About the document

Published date
documents in English
term papers
3 pages
0 times
Validated by
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction.
  2. Sacrificing sovereignity with the creation of international organisation in relation to the European Union.
    1. Increase in international organisations.
    2. Meaning and understanding of sovereignity.
  3. Sovereignty as political independence.
  4. Sovereignty as jurisdictional independence.
  5. The role of the European Union with regard to Sovereignity.
  6. Conclusion.
  7. Bibliography.

The French campaign for the referendum on the European Constitution has perfectly shown the fear of a loss of state sovereignty due to the European Union within the political elite as well as within the society. With the increase of international organisations, that can be defined as ?a formal, continuous structure established by agreement between members (governmental and/or non-governmental) from two or more sovereign states with the aim of pursuing the common interest of the membership? (Archer, 2001:33), the question of a loss of state sovereignty becomes recurrent. This question is an important one for, since the treaty of Westphalia in 1648, states are defined by their sovereignty. In fact, a modern state is characterised by the supremacy of a government ?on the people, the resources and, ultimately, all other authorities within the territory it controlled? (Axtmann and Grant, 1999:32). So we must ask if the belonging to an international organisation imply a sacrifice of this supremacy, a sacrifice of state sovereignty. In a first part, using the example of the European Union, we will see that actually the creation of an international organisation implies in some extent a sacrifice of sovereignty, but secondly we will see that a more precise definition of ?sovereignty? entails to qualify this statement.

[...] So we have tried to show that to answer the question does the creation of an international organisation imply a sacrifice of sovereignty we have to define first the concept of sovereignty. If we talk about jurisdictional independence or political independence, therefore the sovereignty of the states is challenged in some extent. But defining sovereignty as constitutional independence seems more relevant and in this case unless the states set up an organisation which would not be a treaty-based organisation but a constitutional-based sovereign state, the sovereignty is not sacrificed. [...]

[...] In the other side, the second and third pillars are totally intergovernmental with a marginal role for Commission and Parliament, no role for the Court and the necessity of unanimous decision of all member states (Salmon, 1999:266). The difference between the pillars' decision-making processes embodies the two divergent tendencies at work since the beginning of the European construction: those in favour of an intergovernmental Europe, so not really different from all the other international organisations, and those in favour of a federal one with supranational institutions. [...]

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

International Organisation: The UN system

 Politics & international   |  International affairs   |  Term papers   |  01/12/2009   |   .doc   |   8 pages

How adequate is the question of sovereignty in the political disputes within Britain about the...

 Politics & international   |  Political science   |  Presentation   |  01/13/2009   |   .doc   |   7 pages

Top sold for international relations

How useful is the term "New terrorism" in distinguishing -9/11 post terrorism from the form that...

 Politics & international   |  International affairs   |  Presentation   |  09/29/2010   |   .doc   |   7 pages

An evaluation of constructivism as an approach to international relations theory

 Politics & international   |  International affairs   |  Presentation   |  09/29/2010   |   .doc   |   11 pages