Search icone
Search and publish your papers

Democracy for the few (chap. 15), Michael Parenti

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

General public

About the document

Published date
documents in English
book reviews
4 pages
General public
0 times
Validated by
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction.
  2. Government by secrecy and deception.
  3. Bureaucratic action and inaction.
  4. Little administrators and big businessmen.
  5. Public authority in private hands.
  6. Government 'Meddling'.
  7. Conclusion.

Michael Parenti is a professor of political science at several American universities. He has a PhD in political science from Yale University. He is known for being a progressive activist and a provocative thinker. As such, he wrote numerous books that focused on the American nation, the role of USA in the world and the power of money. The relation between democracy and the economic power - which is particularly present in his book Democracy for the few also belongs to his favourite themes.
Michael Parenti's major objective in this excerpt is to point out the fact that we have to consider the tasks of the bureaucracy as political ones. His purpose is hence to investigate the politico-administrative world of the United States of America, showing to what extent and how exactly the administrative departments and agencies are situated on the center of a network of power and contradictory interests.

[...] The principal result is that federal agencies at the time Parenti wrote Democracy for the Few, were at the service of the corporate interests, even sometimes at their ?devotion? as Parenti explains it. In the case of the Interstate Commerce Commission they literally ran for the trucking and railroad companies. Or at least interest groups achieve to develop very cooperative or ?constructive? relations with their respective ?regulation-agencies?, which are in some cases even run by administrators directly appointed by the dominant corporate executives. [...]

[...] In truth, the agencies and departments can independently pass so-called rulings that often have the same enforcement value than the legislation. On the contrary, it is quite possible that their roles and missions are defined in a legislation, but in general this one ?allows leeway in application? (Parenti). The writer achieves rightly to synthesize some bias the people can have towards the bureaucracy in the following sentence: political process does not end with the passage of a bill but continues with equal or even greater intensity at the administrative level albeit in more covert fashion?. [...]

Top sold for political science

Anarchy and the limits of cooperation: a realist critique of the liberal institutionalism - J.M....

 Politics & international   |  Political science   |  Case study   |  02/27/2013   |   .doc   |   2 pages

A critical review of Downs, A. (1957) 'An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy',...

 Politics & international   |  Political science   |  Case study   |  07/23/2013   |   .doc   |   3 pages

Recent documents in political science category

Are the American democratic principles at risk today?

 Politics & international   |  Political science   |  Presentation   |  02/28/2019   |   .doc   |   2 pages

Is the US a democracy?

 Politics & international   |  Political science   |  Presentation   |  02/27/2019   |   .doc   |   3 pages