Search icone
Search and publish your papers
Our Guarantee
We guarantee quality.
Find out more!

Capitalism’s downfall

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

Independent Professional
General public

About the document

Published date
documents in English
case study
5 pages
General public
0 times
Validated by
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction
  2. Karl Heinrich Marx
  3. Gyorgy Lukacs
  4. Theodor W. Adorno
  5. Eduard Bernstein's belief
  6. Conclusion

March 4th, 1883 is the date that Karl Heinrich Marx passed away, however his theories and legacy still live to this day. Post-mortem, his messaged was interpreted and criticized very differently between numerous political scientists, philosophers and theorists. Presently, the leftist movement, which surrounds itself around his research and theories, is divided into two parties over the fall of capitalism. These two parties either believe democratic means is the answer, yet some believe constant radical steps is the only means possible. The collapse of capitalism was a crucial topic with which these critics discussed because this end never occurred within Marx's time. Marx's depiction and theory of the breakdown is described in depth inside the Manifesto. Marx believed that capitalism would destroy itself because the system would grow to such a height that it would be unable to sustain itself any longer. Once this complete plummet occurred and the working class realized the end of capitalism was near, they would ?openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions.

Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communistic revolution? (Marx 500). Other theorists, on the other hand, feel that this approach to free mankind from capitalism is either too difficult or completely the wrong approach. Still other theorists would argue that capitalism is so ingrained within society that an attempt to resist this social order is futile, which will only lead to alienation of the individual from society. In the end, the only thing a majority of the leftist theorists can agree on is that some type of action must be taken in order to overcome capitalism.

[...] Adorno believes there is no hope and capitalism will slowly take over every domain of society. The only way mankind will be able to be liberated is through constant resistance. This resistance however would result in a complete alienation of the self from society. Even an individual's private resistance is met with much hostility from society as well, child who prefers to listen to serious music or practice the piano rather than watch a baseball game or television will have to suffer as a ?sissy' in his class or in the other groups to which he belongs and which embody far more authority than parents or teacher? (Perennial Fashion Jazz 208). [...]

[...] This slow separation however could also be to blame on the people and the working class. Although such commodities and mediums of exchange are quite compelling and seducing to watch or participate in, it is the individual that makes the decision to either watch endless television shows with numerous commercials as well as listen to present-day music with no meaning or unique qualities. Lukács is correct to blame the bourgeois for producing and distributing these useless products that the proletariat of today considers necessities, on the other hand the bourgeois is simply producing these goods in order to create more capital. [...]

[...] Douglas Mackay and Stephen Bronner. Routledge: New York 199-209. Adorno, Theodor. ?Society.? Critical Theory and Society. Ed. Douglas Mackay and Stephen Bronner. Routledge: New York 267-275. Bernstein, Eduard. The Preconditions of Socialism. [...]

[...] It is Bernstein's observation that capitalism is not an institution that will suddenly fall as Marx predicts, but will prosper leading to democratic involvement through social wealth. This idea follows the concept that as long as the working class improves it will reflect the society from which it improves. Compared to Adorno and Lukács, Bernstein is the only theorist to profess such action that would ultimately make a difference if the proletariat were able to simply participate. This action does not call for bloodshed or complete disruption of society, but a gradual democratic push towards institutions and amendments that benefit society as opposed to ideally sitting by and letting capitalism reap the benefits of our complacency. [...]

[...] Robert Tucker. W.W. Norton & Company: New York 473-500. [...]

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

The downfall of Lehman Brothers and its relation with the 2008 financial crisis

 Economics & finance   |  Economics   |  Term papers   |  01/17/2011   |   .doc   |   15 pages

The mutations of social democracy (late XIXth century- 1945): From long-term aspirations to "here...

 Politics & international   |  Political science   |  Case study   |  05/03/2012   |   .pdf   |   5 pages

Top sold for political science

How did the rise of mass production transform the role of the United States in the international...

 Politics & international   |  Political science   |  Term papers   |  05/03/2011   |   .doc   |   4 pages

A critical review of Downs, A. (1957) 'An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy',...

 Politics & international   |  Political science   |  Case study   |  07/23/2013   |   .doc   |   3 pages