Search icone
Search and publish your papers

Building democratic institutions: East and West Lecturer: A. Dimitrova

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author


About the document

Published date
documents in English
6 pages
0 times
Validated by
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction.
  2. Making democracy work: Civic traditions of modern Italy by Robert Putnam.
  3. Putnam's idea that post-communist states should be affected by a 'vicious circle'.
  4. Social capital networks during socialism.
  5. The case-study of Novgorod the Great (north-western Russian city).
  6. Ukrainian Orange Revolution 2004: Tllustration of Tong's idea that social capital can emerge from the bottom.
  7. Conclusion.
  8. Bibliography.

The accession in May 2004 of eight countries from Eastern Europe to the European Union and the future membership of Romania and Bulgaria in 2007 tends to show the importance, for these post-communist states, to find a new order and to gain more stability and security. Indeed, the end of the Cold War liberates Eastern and Central Europe from communism, but the road to efficient democracy is still long. Membership of the European Union or NATO seems to be a fundamental element for the stabilization process. Nonetheless, external aid (money, settlement of non-governmental organisations?) is not enough and some scholars believe in a more bottom-up way to build democracy. Such is the case with Robert Putnam, who underlined in his works the importance of a civil community (or social capital) capable of developing and strengthening institutions and consequently of building democracy. After explaining the theory of Putnam more in depth, we will discuss if he is right in saying that a sufficient stock of social capital is necessary for the success of democracy when it applies to Eastern Europe.

[...] If we follow Putnam's idea, post-communist states should be affected by a ?vicious circle?, prevented them to establish and strengthen formal democratic institutions. Indeed, the absence of a strong civic community is self-reinforcing: ?defection, distrust, shirking, exploitation, isolation, disorder, and stagnation [being the characteristics of a lack of social capital] intensify one another in a suffocating miasma of vicious circles?[8]. One of the first main critics on Putnam's works was about his concept of social capital as being a necessary and sufficient condition for democracy. [...]

[...] Bibliography Books and journals: Anderson, Robert, Fish, Steven, Hanson, Stephen and Roeder, Philip, Postcommunism and the theory of democracy, (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2001) Badescu, G., Uslaner, E., Social Capital and the Transition to Democracy (London, Routledge, 2003) Himka, John-Paul, ?Issues, Outcome and Prospects: The Ukrainian Events', Against the Current, Vol.10, No Mihaylova, Dimitrina Social Capital in Central and Eastern Europe: a critical assessment and literature review (Center for Policy Studies, Central European University, 2004) available at http:// /eps/dev/papers/0511/0511001.pdf Nichols, Thomas, ?Russian democracy and social capital' Social Science Information, Vol No.4, p.631 Paxton, Pamela ?Social Capital and Democracy: an interdependent relationship', American Sociological Review, Vol Petro, Nicolai ?Creating Social Capital in Russia: The Novgorod Model', World Development, No.29(2) Putnam, Robert D., Making democracy work : Civic traditions in Modern Italy (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1993) Putnam Robert D., Democracies in Flux : the Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society, (Oxford, University Press, 2002) Rose, Richard and Mishler, William, ?Trust in untrustworthy institutions: culture and institutional performance in post-communist societies', Centre for the Study of Public Policy, No Rose, Richard and Weller, Craig, ?What does social capital add to democratic values', Centre for the Study of Public Policy, No Websites: Boix, Carles and Posner, Daniel N., Making Social Capital Work: A Review of Robert Putnam's Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy (Harvard University, 1996): Himka, John-Paul, Issues, Outcome and Prospects: The Ukrainian Events, available at: Kolybashkina, Nina and Temnenko, Ksenia, Social Capital and Civil Society in the Making of Democracy in the Ukraine: a case-study of Orange Revolution: 4d_ISTR-EMES_Koly_Temn.pdf Levin, M.A., The Importance of Civic Community for Effective Democracy (1997): R.D. [...]

[...] In the West we find exclusivist ?Central Europeans? who supported Yushchenko, which was also the case of the ?Euro-Ukrainians? located in Kiev, who were both nationalist and cosmopolitan people and as such they took actively part of the Revolution. On the other hand, Yanukovych represented the ?post-Soviet? community, living in the South and East of the country and characterized by weak society ties and informal social capital. In Ukraine there was then no unanimous sense of national identity and the Revolution might have brought an ever deeper division of the country, especially when we know that the ?post-Soviets? reacted to the protests by a threat of secession. [...]

Top sold for political science

Anarchy and the limits of cooperation: a realist critique of the liberal institutionalism - J.M....

 Politics & international   |  Political science   |  Case study   |  02/27/2013   |   .doc   |   2 pages

A critical review of Downs, A. (1957) 'An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy',...

 Politics & international   |  Political science   |  Case study   |  07/23/2013   |   .doc   |   3 pages

Recent documents in political science category

Are the American democratic principles at risk today?

 Politics & international   |  Political science   |  Presentation   |  02/28/2019   |   .doc   |   2 pages

Is the US a democracy?

 Politics & international   |  Political science   |  Presentation   |  02/27/2019   |   .doc   |   3 pages