Search icone
Search and publish your papers

Capacities of the president of the Federation of Russia

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

General public

About the document

Published date
documents in English
5 pages
General public
0 times
Validated by
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction
  2. The reasons for the Irish "no"
    1. The context of the referendum
    2. The reasons for the rejection
  3. The ways out of the crisis
    1. How did the crisis happen?
    2. What to do now?

The Russian constitution of 25 December 1993 is the product of a coup by Boris Yeltsin, who, by presidential decree and his image as a strong advocate of Russia dissolved the Congress of Deputies. Two weeks later, he proposed a draft constitution for the Russian Federation, which was approved though suspicions had weighed heavily on the organization and the election results.

Conferring extraordinarily broad powers to the president, the new political system favored the executive and dominated the political organization. The result of a desire for a prominent presidential power, the constitution provided a blurred separation of powers and allowed the head of state to absorb the majority of skills. In addition, this power has a strong practice that strengthened the rule by men who monopolized the political space and an authoritarian presidential system.

To what extent are the privileges granted by the Constitution to the President of the Russian Federation and how much can they emerge from a concentrated power and a presidential system as authoritarian?

While the Constitution of the Russian Federation is marked by a parliamentary sub-character that allows the emergence of a regime "super-presidential", it is to question the extent of the powers granted to the Chief of the state. Then, it seems pertinent to ask how this power is reinforced by a prominent personal practice of power that strengthens the regime and its authoritarian president.

Russia is not democratic and has always been steeped in tradition where it has always been headed by a single personality. It can be said that Russia was ruled "by the Tsars Tsars." Indeed, whether tsarist, Bolshevism, Stalinism, or of contemporary Russia, political power has always been held by one man, even if the institutions and constitutions have changed.

For the current President of the Government, the lack of state authority has led private corporations to appropriate the functions of the state. He believes that federalism has led to a form of competition for control of certain fundamental powers of the state.

Tags: federation of Russia; capacities of the President of Russia Federation; an authoritarian presidential system; Constitution of the Russian Federation;

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

The dynamics of the relations between the European Unions and Russia

 Politics & international   |  European union   |  Presentation   |  09/29/2010   |   .doc   |   11 pages

The Federation of Russia (1993-2006)

 Politics & international   |  Political science   |  Term papers   |  12/15/2010   |   .doc   |   6 pages

Top sold for political science

A critical review of Downs, A. (1957) 'An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy',...

 Politics & international   |  Political science   |  Case study   |  07/23/2013   |   .doc   |   3 pages

How did the rise of mass production transform the role of the United States in the international...

 Politics & international   |  Political science   |  Term papers   |  05/03/2011   |   .doc   |   4 pages