Search icone
Search and publish your papers

Discuss de Gaulle’s handling of the Algerian War and consider some of the ways in which he exploited the crisis to political ends

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author


About the document

Published date
documents in English
3 pages
1 times
Validated by
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction.
  2. The assumption and expectation.
  3. General de Gaulle.
  4. Public support from all sides.
  5. The active disobedience of sections of the army.
  6. Conclusion.
  7. Bibliography.

In 1954, the discontent displayed by Algerian rebels, the Front de Libération National, demanding independence, turned into war and was not settled until 1962, with the involvement of the French national hero, General de Gaulle. The situation in Algeria was different to that in Tunisia or even Morocco due to the fact that Algeria was an integral department of France and not a colony. ?The rebellion of 1954 became a war because a numerically dominant but economically and politically backward Moslem population, in a large, strategically situated territory, geographically very close to France, sought independence from her, while a minority mainly of European origin, politically, economically and administratively dominant, wanted passionately to remain French?1. Due to France suffering defeat in Europe in 1940, and in Indochina 14 years later, accompanied by the loss of Tunisia and Morocco, it was particularly important for their national esteem that they be on the victorious side in the Algerian crisis. Therefore ?in 1958 the Fourth Republic handed over to General de Gaulle the whole insoluble problem of Algeria?2 as General de Gaulle was deemed the only man possible to solve the situation and avert a civil war.

[...] De Gaulle exploited his victory in solving the Algerian crisis to benefit him and really mould the Fifth Republic to suit him. In conclusion, ?General de Gaulle employed both direct and indirect tactics to restore the authority of the state and to increase his own authority and prestige as head of the state. The Constitution was designed to be an instrument of presidential power, as well as of government stability, and the President's conception of his own function as ?arbitrator? did not prevent him from combining in practice the roles of umpire and captain of the team. [...]

[...] In the name of France and the Republic, by virtue of the power vested in me by the constitution to consult the citizenry, on the condition that God may grant me life and that the people may listen to me, I commit myself to asking, on the one hand, the Algerians in their twelve departments what they definitively want to be, and, on the other, all the French people to endorse that choice.?9. Finally, the promise of French Algeria had been abandoned and de Gaulle was going ahead with his plans for self- determination. [...]

Top sold for political science

Anarchy and the limits of cooperation: a realist critique of the liberal institutionalism - J.M....

 Politics & international   |  Political science   |  Case study   |  02/27/2013   |   .doc   |   2 pages

A critical review of Downs, A. (1957) 'An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy',...

 Politics & international   |  Political science   |  Case study   |  07/23/2013   |   .doc   |   3 pages

Recent documents in political science category

Are the American democratic principles at risk today?

 Politics & international   |  Political science   |  Presentation   |  02/28/2019   |   .doc   |   2 pages

Is the US a democracy?

 Politics & international   |  Political science   |  Presentation   |  02/27/2019   |   .doc   |   3 pages