Search icone
Search and publish your papers

Extradition and the European warrant for arrest

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

Level
Expert

About the document

Published date
Language
documents in English
Format
Word
Type
presentations
Pages
5 pages
Level
Expert
Accessed
0 times
Validated by
Committee Oboolo.com
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Intoduction
  2. PART I: The Kyoto Protocol
    1. Global warming
    2. The vertices of the earth
    3. The contents of the Protocol
  3. PART II: American diplomacy around the Kyoto Protocol
    1. General Remarks
    2. The positions of the presidents of the United States before the Kyoto Protocol
    3. The presidencies of Bill Clinton (1993-2001)
    4. The term of George W. Bush (2001-2009)
  4. Conclusion

Mamoun Darkanzali of Germany, Cesare Battisti and Harry Flynn in France, and Patrick Henry in Spain: These are all names that illustrate the difficulties encountered in the implementation and execution of extradition procedures within the European Union. It is clear that the borders allow the free movement of EU citizens within the area and are covered by the Schengen Agreement that transformed into walls when it comes to extradite individuals to the judge or the enforcement of a sentence.

Moreover, following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, member countries of the European Union have found themselves facing the need to strengthen judicial cooperation, to abolish the penal and judicial boundaries and increase its effectiveness in this area. While member countries of the EEC and the EU since 1957 were parties to the European Convention on Extradition, from the 1970s to the simplification and unification of the traditional extradition procedure, they were seen to be too political and too complex. Since 2002, the European arrest warrant replaced the instruments on extradition.

This document will study the passage of a legal process, within the space community and see how the European arrest warrant differs from extradition. In the first part, it will focus on the substitution of the MFA to the traditional extradition. Then in the second part, it will study the contributions of the MFA in classical extradition law. The European arrest warrant is a procedure to replace the traditional mechanism for extradition in the European Union.

Extradition is defined as a legal mechanism by which a state (state required) delivers a person who is present in its territory to another state (requesting state) who calls for prosecution or execution of a sentence.

Tags: European Convention on Extradition; Legal process; European arrest warrant; contributions of the MFA; classical extradition law;

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

Critically assess the legal basis and context of the European arrest warrant

 Law & contracts   |  European   |  Presentation   |  09/29/2010   |   .doc   |   6 pages

The evolution of European judicial cooperation in criminal matters since the Maastricht Treaty

 Law & contracts   |  European   |  Presentation   |  09/29/2010   |   .doc   |   7 pages

Top sold for political science

Anarchy and the limits of cooperation: a realist critique of the liberal institutionalism - J.M....

 Politics & international   |  Political science   |  Case study   |  02/27/2013   |   .doc   |   2 pages

A critical review of Downs, A. (1957) 'An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy',...

 Politics & international   |  Political science   |  Case study   |  07/23/2013   |   .doc   |   3 pages