Search icone
Search and publish your papers

The function of democratic control of the European Parliament – Analysis of S. Veil’s speech

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

Level
General public

About the document

Published date
Language
documents in English
Format
Word
Type
presentations
Pages
3 pages
Level
General public
Accessed
0 times
Validated by
Committee Oboolo.com
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Competence of the EP until 1979.
  2. The original wish of S. Veil.
  3. The effect of the new authority of the EP on its function of democratic control.
  4. Conclusion.
  5. Bibliography.

Since the origins of the building of the European Community, the idea of a direct election of the EP was present. In the Rome Treaty, the commitment to abolish the system of nominated members was settled, but no timetable was laid down. Thus, it occurred only in 1979, after the reluctance of the Council of Ministers had been reduced. After that first election, the parliament held its first session on 11 July 1979, electing Simone Veil MEP as its President. Veil was also the first woman President of the Parliament since it was formed as the Common Assembly, and held an introductory speech of her mandate. Through this speech of Simone Veil, we will analyze the consequences of the direct election of the Parliament on its function of democratic control over the other institutions.

[...] From 1958 to 1979, there was therefore a paradox: the EP could not control the Council of Ministers, which, until the European Council came, was the only institution with legislative power, so it should be controlled as such. Indeed, for such a control, a greater legitimacy was required for the EP. Nevertheless, the Council steadily refused in the 60s and 70s the EP to be directly elected. When, at the end of the 70s, the EP threatened to take the Council to the European Court of Justice, it gave in. [...]


[...] But on the other hand, as the increase of the EP's role would come insidiously (it is not clearly institutionalised, but comes progressively through the practice), this seems to be a bit pernicious as well, und crammed with uncertainty. However, in how far will these wishes be realised within the further history of the EP? III) The effect of the new authority of the EP on its function of democratic control The further history of the building of Europe confirmed the wishes of S. Veil, but partially only. Indeed, it's clear that the EP increased its role of control. [...]

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

Honor killing in the United Kingdom

 Social studies   |  Sociology   |  Case study   |  07/31/2009   |   .rtf   |   31 pages

The constitutional framework of Europe

 Law & contracts   |  Constitutional   |  Term papers   |  12/02/2010   |   .doc   |   10 pages

Top sold for political science

Anarchy and the limits of cooperation: a realist critique of the liberal institutionalism - J.M....

 Politics & international   |  Political science   |  Case study   |  02/27/2013   |   .doc   |   2 pages

A critical review of Downs, A. (1957) 'An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy',...

 Politics & international   |  Political science   |  Case study   |  07/23/2013   |   .doc   |   3 pages