Search icone
Search and publish your papers

To what extent can the Thatcher-type reforms be applied in France or adapted to France?

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

Level
General public

About the document

Published date
Language
documents in English
Format
Word
Type
presentations
Pages
3 pages
Level
General public
Accessed
0 times
Validated by
Committee Oboolo.com
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction.
  2. similarities between N. Sarkozy and M. Thatcher.
  3. Change in the political colour: 1964 and 1979 in England and 1981 and 2002 in France.
  4. Another main difference between the situations in the two countries.
  5. Conclusion.
  6. Bibliography.

During the past twelve years, three of Jacques Chirac's Prime ministers -Alain Juppé, Jean-Pierre Raffarin and Dominique de Villepin- decided to reform but backed out in the face of protests. The election of a new President, who claimed that he was the candidate for change, during the whole campaign, can thus appear as a turning-point. In July 2007, during the presidential campaign, Nicolas Sarkozy said « I'm neither Thatcher nor Reagan ». Yet in November 2007, the economist published an article entitled « Sarkozy's Thatcher moment ». It is therefore interesting to wonder if Nicolas Sarkozy can become France's Margaret Thatcher. In other words, with the arrival of N. Sarkozy, to what extent can the Thatcher-type reforms be applied in France, or adapted to France?

[...] Many parameters, such as cultural and historical differences between Great-Britain and France, indicate that it will be quite difficult to adapt the Thatcher-type reforms to France. First, the situations in Great-Britain in 1979 and in France in 2007 are very different. Indeed, the intensity of the crisis was much higher in Britain than it is in France. France is not comparable with the very economically sick Great Britain of the 1970's where there was an obligation to reform. In France, with the Euro, there are alternatives to shock treatment. [...]


[...] In 1979, half of the British workers belonged to a union whereas only of the French are organized today. M. Thatcher wanted to reduce the power of the unions. On the contrary, the modernisation of social relations in France requires the strengthening of unions, which are too weak the government is aware of that. Second, N. Sarkozy's conception of politics also differs from M. Thatcher's, what is understandable with such differences between the contexts in the two countries. There are ideological differences. [...]

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

To what extent can the Thatcher-type reforms be applied in France or adapted to France?

 Economics & finance   |  Economics   |  Presentation   |  09/29/2010   |   .doc   |   2 pages

Ability to change in the social area, veto points and strategies used: the example of French...

 Politics & international   |  Political science   |  Book review   |  09/29/2010   |   .doc   |   17 pages

Top sold for political science

Anarchy and the limits of cooperation: a realist critique of the liberal institutionalism - J.M....

 Politics & international   |  Political science   |  Case study   |  02/27/2013   |   .doc   |   2 pages

Discussion about the differences between nationalism and national identity

 Politics & international   |  Political science   |  Presentation   |  09/29/2010   |   .doc   |   8 pages