Search icone
Search and publish your papers

The Censorship of Pornography

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author


About the document

Published date
documents in English
case study
4 pages
0 times
Validated by
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction
  2. Marshall's error when discussing what should and should not be allowed in a library
  3. Appealing to people's feelings on the matter
  4. Concern about the consequences of his writing
  5. The problem: Making cases harder
  6. Conclusion
  7. Works cited

Robert Marshall's ?Internet Filters Should Be Used to Reduce Access to Internet Pornography? addresses the controversial issues of pornography and Internet censorship simultaneously. Pornography is controversial because of the often graphic nature of the material; and its effect on people, while examined in numerous studies, cannot always be tangibly qualified. Internet censorship enters an uncharted grey area because while free speech should be protected, the Internet is an unsupervised, unregulated Mecca for material normally excluded from protection. As Marshall attacks public libraries and schools as places that should filter pornography because of the harm he claims it can inflict on minors, he makes recommendations for courses of action.

[...] His flawed arguments and vague use of the word ?pornography? might work against him when speaking to youth as pornography is not nearly as taboo as it once was. Guys joke in classes about Internet porn, and many mainstream publications depict half-naked women (and occasionally men), often times in erotic positions and/or clothing. It does not seem that young adults hold pornography and related, softer materials responsible for problems of sexual deviance the way older generations do. This could be due to a lack of education about the topic or lack of exposure to studies examining the relationship between sexual violence and pornography. [...]

[...] Controversy in the past surrounding so-called ?banned books? has incited far too much furor over their legal authority to place in their hands the job of Internet censorship of pornography through the use of filters on public computers. Instead, Marshall could have better spent his time properly defining what he means by ?pornography? than placing the responsibility of its censorship on others. Marshall is also guilty of failing to cite any major studies linking sexual deviance and pornography, and there are many, so there is little excuse for this mistake. [...]

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

The specific problems of Internet censorship and information poverty in the developed world

 Science & technology   |  Computer science   |  Presentation   |  06/17/2008   |   .doc   |   5 pages

Pornography is not your friend: Pornography and the First Amendment

 Social studies   |  Educational studies   |  Presentation   |  07/08/2008   |   .doc   |   4 pages

Top sold for social sciences

Cultural diversity

 Politics & international   |  Social sciences   |  Presentation   |  02/05/2009   |   .doc   |   5 pages