Search icone
Search and publish your papers

Female infanticide and female feticide

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

 
Level
General public
Study
internation...
School/University
University...

About the document

Published date
Language
documents in English
Format
Word
Type
presentations
Pages
3 pages
Level
General public
Accessed
1 times
Validated by
Committee Oboolo.com
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction
  2. The past of female infanticide
  3. Making women mothers and murderers
  4. Reasons that lead to female infanticide
    1. Validation for giving birth to sons
  5. The controversy surrounding female feticide
  6. Debate about banning SDT's
  7. Feminist making a philosophical debate about abortion
  8. Conclusion
  9. References

Female infanticide and female feticide represent serious social problems in India. However, these issues also create much debate over a woman's right to choose whether or not to have a child. While women in India do have the right to terminate a pregnancy, there are several legal stipulations that make having an abortion less about giving women rights, and more about controlling women's reproductive capabilities (Menon, 1995). Women often do not choose to have sex-selective abortions; instead their husband and his family pressure them into aborting unwanted female fetuses (Kusum, 1993). Thus, while abortion is legal under specific circumstances, it is often used as a way to selectively breed male children who are preferred in Indian culture. Therefore, many feminists see abortion rights in India as contradictory to feminist discourse because abortion rights are not being used to liberate women, but to re-enforce the cultural preference for sons (Menon, 1995). However, the practices of female feticide and, to a lesser extent, female infanticide are increasing in India, which has led to a declining sex ratio between male and female children: in 2001 the sex ratio was 933 females to 1000 males (Bandyopadhyay, 2003). In comparison, the average global sex ratio at birth (SRB) is 105 males to 100 females; however, in Delhi, India the SRB is 117 to 100 (The President's Council on Bioethics, 2003). Therefore, while there is much debate among feminists about how to curb this problem, it is clear that something must be done to improve the overall position of women in India. However, because of the cultural devaluation of women in India due to son preference, and women's economic drain on families because of expensive dowries and weddings, women face much pressure to give birth to sons (Hegde, 1999). Thus, until the Indian culture views women as assets, rather than burdens, the practices of female infanticide and female feticide will continue.

[...] the Indian culture views women as assets, rather than burdens, the practices of female infanticide and female feticide will continue. Female infanticide dates back centuries in many Asian societies. This practice was preferred because it did not put the mother in danger, whereas early abortions were dangerous. Furthermore, contraceptives and pre-modern abortions did not provide parents with the opportunity to choose the sex of their child, but infanticide gave parents this power. During early encounters with societies that practiced infanticide, the West judged the practice as immoral; and observers were surprised that the practice occurred among the rich and the poor, and that priests or Brahmins did not prohibit infanticide (Caldwell & Caldwell, 2005). [...]


[...] This technology is relatively inexpensive and accessible in most areas, which makes female infanticide less common (Kusum, 1993). In a recent study in the Maharashtra state, researchers determined that out of 8,000 aborted fetuses of those fetuses were female (Bandyopadhyay, 2003). There are many factors that lead to such striking numbers. Indian women receive validation from giving birth to sons, and therefore, they continue having children until they have a son. Also, while women in India legally have inheritance rights, land and money is generally passed down through sons (Bandyopadhyay, 2003). [...]

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

A Defense of the Capabilities Approach

 Philosophy & literature   |  Humanities/philosophy   |  Presentation   |  05/03/2007   |   .doc   |   8 pages

Top sold for social sciences

Cultural diversity

 Politics & international   |  Social sciences   |  Presentation   |  02/05/2009   |   .doc   |   5 pages

SWOT analysis on National Society of the Prevention Cruelty to Children's Online Program

 Politics & international   |  Social sciences   |  Term papers   |  05/30/2009   |   .doc   |   4 pages