Search icone
Search and publish your papers

Ronald McDonald is More President than Bush

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author


About the document

Published date
documents in English
4 pages
1 times
Validated by
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction
  2. the perfect excuse to punish entire populations
  3. The original Panopticon
  4. Discipline for the sole purpose of punishment
  5. The division between the public and private sphere
  6. Conclusion
  7. Bibliography

Throughout history, the global aristocracy has faced only one task more daunting than that of achieving prosperity: the eternal struggle to stand undoubtedly separate from the impoverished, and consequently, to subordinate them. And they have made this separation very clear with the use and abuse of outward signs of wealth. Yet one of the most popular symbols of status centuries ago has slowly slipped into the realm of unspeakable humiliation. Obesity had been the ultimate expression of riches; the poor were lucky to get their hands on bread and water let alone the extravagance that blessed the tables of the nobility each night. Why now is near-anorexia the utmost manifestation of glamour? When did the likes of Lillian Russell, who was ?known and admired for her hearty appetite, ample body . . . and challenging, fleshly arresting beauty,? become merely fat in the eyes of Western culture? (Bordo 141). Maybe one person changed the world, or maybe Hollywood is to blame, but it is clear that people are fearful of obesity to the point of altering how they convey their authority and fame, yet they never base their fear on the health risks associated with being overweight. In ?Panopticism,? Michele Foucault explores the history of discipline and the strength derived from control of the masses, and as the guiding force behind hunger and weight, food has become an example of this institution of power that both controls and dehumanizes society.

[...] A body can take more indulgence than it can take neglect, and advertisements still entice society into absolute subordination under food to the point of establishing guidelines for eating disorders (Bordo 165). Like any form of panopticism, one chooses to enter the system. Prison is for those who break the law and school is for those who wish to be educated. Yet food is not for those who wish to be fed. It has even lost its original purpose, its identity, its symbolic representation of wealth, because those can afford to be eating well are dieting?and hungry?most of the time? (142). [...]

[...] All that matters to Louise is that the person she loves thinks she should diet, and that means it must be the right thing to do. The division between the public and private sphere factors twice into any decision to diet in very contradictory means. Managers, waiters, drunk men at the bar: one may only encounter these faces once, and never see them again. Any initial fear of being deemed unworthy by these foreign eyes dissipates with time. But the opinions of family and neighbors, friends and co-workers, can badger a conscience forever. [...]

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

The Economy of the United States during conflict

 Economics & finance   |  Economics   |  Thesis   |  01/10/2011   |   .doc   |   31 pages

The question of the multiculturalism in the United States through the prospects for immigration,...

 Politics & international   |  Political science   |  Book review   |  01/27/2011   |   .doc   |   10 pages

Top sold for social sciences

Critically evaluating the ASPIRE model of social work

 Politics & international   |  Social sciences   |  Presentation   |  02/20/2009   |   .doc   |   7 pages

SWOT analysis on National Society of the Prevention Cruelty to Children's Online Program

 Politics & international   |  Social sciences   |  Term papers   |  05/30/2009   |   .doc   |   4 pages