Search icone
Search and publish your papers

The connections between the education system and social inequality in contemporary Ireland.

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

General public
european union
IEP Paris

About the document

Published date
documents in English
3 pages
General public
1 times
Validated by
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction
  2. Vocational schools found in working class areas
  3. Financial concerns
  4. Conclusion
  5. Works cited

The issue we are presented with here is a complex one at the best of times. It brings us back to the dilemma of ?which came first ? the chicken or the egg?? because while it is widely accepted that the Irish education system may lead to social inequality, I maintain that this view is a debatable one. I believe it is possible to argue the case that social inequality in Ireland influences and shapes our education system because, in general, most Western education systems are commonly based upon societal values and customs. However, for the purposes of this essay I will accept the education system as being the determinant of social inequality, looking specifically at secondary-level education and using Goldthorpe's model of class categorisation (Breen and Whelan, 1996) as a discriminator between the various social classes and as a basis for my definition of the different social groupings, however I will mainly be concentrating on the working-class (groups IVc through to VIIb) and the middle-class categories (groups I through to IVb.)

[...] The cultural climate in said schools might well breed educational success if we include in the term the successful learning of the manual skills taught in vocational schools such as woodwork and metalwork. Unfortunately, ?educational success? in contemporary Ireland translates directly to exam results, namely those of the Leaving Certificate, which long been considered to have had a major influence in determining the shape and content of education in Ireland' (Mulcahy, 1989:87), a yardstick by which all secondary level students are measured and judged. [...]

[...] Bourdieu's concept of culture capital refers to the ?existence of dominant and socially legitimised ideals about what is culturally valued and desirable in our society' (Tovey and Share, 2000:176) and his theory presents us with the idea that this cultural capital, which is naturally possessed by the upper and middle-classes, is forced upon all classes, regardless of how detached they may be from this sort of culture, by means of the hidden curriculum. To Bordieu, the education system's aim, be it accidental or deliberate, is maintain and legitimate a class divided society' (Hill and Cole, 2001:101.) Under his thinking, the curriculum is a means of bringing about cultural reproduction. If we suppose this theory to be true, which I do, the status of social inequality in the education system stays the same. The working classes continue to be denied access to a full and healthy educational career because of social and [...]

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

A closer examination of the phenomenon of globalization and its affect on India

 Economics & finance   |  Economics   |  Research papers   |  05/10/2009   |   .doc   |   117 pages

The Swedish model: Analysis and perspectives

 Politics & international   |  International affairs   |  Term papers   |  10/04/2010   |   .pdf   |   50 pages

Top sold for social sciences

Critically evaluating the ASPIRE model of social work

 Politics & international   |  Social sciences   |  Presentation   |  02/20/2009   |   .doc   |   7 pages

Cultural diversity

 Politics & international   |  Social sciences   |  Presentation   |  02/05/2009   |   .doc   |   5 pages