Search icone
Search and publish your papers

Media criticism and theory

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

General public
film studies

About the document

Published date
documents in English
research papers
3 pages
General public
0 times
Validated by
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction
  2. Dave Laing's view
  3. Defining musical auteurism
  4. The second premise of the auteur theory
  5. Andrew Sarris and critics
  6. Roger Waters' possible status of an auteur
  7. A clear judgment concerning the relation of serious music to popular music
  8. Conclusion
  9. Works cited

The concept of auteurism has been around for more than half a century, and has been used as a tool for studying both film, and the people behind these films. But in 1971, this concept was applied to the field of music by Dave Laing:
The musical equivalent of the metteur en sc?ne is the performer who regards a song as an actor does a part ? as something to be expressed, something to get across. The aim is to render the lyric faithfully. An obvious example of the genre is the ?protest? singer, whose work subordinates music to message. The vocal style of the singer is determined almost entirely by the emotional connotations of the words. The approach of the rock auteur, however, is determined not by the unique features of the song but by his personal style, the ensemble of vocal effects that characterize the whole body of his work (Laing, 327).

[...] Using this as an example of how I will examine the different possible concepts that make up auteurism, it is evident that, even though there are not many articles in the textbooks about auteur music, I will (hopefully) be able to dissect each concept and see how it applies to auteurism and to the music of Roger Waters. In conclusion, for my final essay I will be answering the second question on the list provided. I will look at the idea of the auteur and auteurism in rock and roll music, specifically as it applies to the music of Roger Waters, both in his Pink Floyd days and his solo career. [...]

[...] [ ] The third and ultimate premise of the auteur theory is concerned with interior meaning, the ultimate glory of the cinema as an art. Interior meaning is extrapolated from the tension between a director's personality and his material. This conception of interior meaning comes close to what Astruc defines as mise-en-sc?ne, but not quite. [ ] The three premises of the auteur theory may be visualized as three concentric circles, the outer circle as technique, the middle circle personal style, and the inner circle interior meaning. [...]

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

Advanced Communication Theory Midterm

 Social studies   |  Psychology   |  Term papers   |  12/11/2007   |   .doc   |   8 pages

Critical race theory and the hidden curriculum: Social works implications for education

 Politics & international   |  Social sciences   |  Term papers   |  07/30/2009   |   .doc   |   7 pages

Top sold for social sciences

Critically evaluating the ASPIRE model of social work

 Politics & international   |  Social sciences   |  Presentation   |  02/20/2009   |   .doc   |   7 pages