Search icone
Search and publish your papers

Surrogacy: Liberating or limiting?

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

General public

About the document

Published date
documents in English
term papers
4 pages
General public
0 times
Validated by
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction
  2. The multiple forms of surrogacy
  3. Contradictory angles of the issue
  4. Secondary problem presented by author
  5. Coherent and relatable points
  6. Opposing surrogacy
  7. The role of governmental and health groups
  8. Conclusion
  9. Works cited

Does surrogacy turn women into ?reproductive vessels? ? Does it liberate women to use their body as they choose, or are women becoming pawns in a scientific experiment? In the essay, Surrogate Motherhood: The Challenge for Feminists, the author, Lori B. Andrews, looks at the conflicting issues of female empowerment and females as slaves to the male dominated contemporary society. Among feminists there is no consensus as to if surrogacy is empowering or demeaning to women. The author argues, albeit not consistently, that opposing surrogacy is counter to many feminist platforms and by removing the right from the woman to bear a child and give it up, greater feminist stances will be undermined. This is the only logical conclusion. Individuals may oppose surrogacy on ethical, health or religious grounds, but no one should hide behind the guise of feminism. Feminism, at its very core, when stripped of the fringe factions and radicalism, is a movement in support of individualism and the right of one person, male or female, to do whatever he or she pleases with his or her body.

There are multiple forms of surrogacy. First, an anonymous or known donor can artificially inseminate a surrogate. Secondly, a surrogate can produce a child through natural conception and then give up the child, with a contract agreed upon before birth, to an adoptive couple. Andrews shows the differing points of view. The author outlines them as follows: the right to be a surrogate mother should not be denied to women because women should be permitted to do whatever they please with their bodies. Conversely, there seems to be a shared belief that women are being turned into ?breeding machines.' As technologies have advanced, women are being given more and more opportunities with reference to their reproductive options.

[...] Often (whether it is a personal choice or that their rights are not clearly articulated to them,) women are without the support system of a new family, as she has given away her child. This should be a greater cause for concern for feminist activists. All women who have given birth are due the same treatment to ensure their bodies fully recover from the grueling process of childbirth and that their emotional state is effectively handled. It is difficult to argue against surrogacy, as a woman's right to choose and for abortion rights, as a woman's right to choose. [...]

[...] Of course, in situations where women are taken advantage of, forced into surrogacy, or coerced into bearing a child with promise of monetary compensation there is a natural cause for concern. In all other cases the power lies with the woman. Further, most surrogacy agreements only pay the birth mother if a child is delivered and can be adopted by the new family, that is, she does not get paid if she miscarries, or if the baby dies during childbirth. [...]

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

Surrogacy: Liberating or limiting?

 Politics & international   |  Social sciences   |  Term papers   |  03/25/2010   |   .doc   |   4 pages

Top sold for medical studies

Reflex Physiology Lab Report

 Science & technology   |  Medical studies   |  Case study   |  10/23/2007   |   .doc   |   4 pages

Pathophysiology of presenting features - Case based assignment

 Science & technology   |  Medical studies   |  Presentation   |  03/21/2016   |   .doc   |   3 pages