Search icone
Search and publish your papers

Crimes against the intangible property

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

.....Wr..........
Level
General public
Study
biology
School/University
London

About the document

Published date
Language
documents in English
Format
Word
Type
case study
Pages
5 pages
Level
General public
Accessed
0 times
Validated by
Committee Oboolo.com
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction
  2. Crimes against intellectual property
  3. Violation of copyright
  4. Search and seizure
  5. Conclusion

Crimes against intellectual property are defined in the Brazilian penal code in title III of the special part, in Articles 184 to 196. They are: crimes against intellectual property, crimes against privilege of invention, crimes against industry and trade marks, crimes against unfair competition. "Articles 187 usque 196 of the Penal Code are repealed. Currently, on the subject, it is in effect nº9.279 law of 14 May 1996 ". Code of Industrial Property (Law Decree No. 7903, August 1945), which, in the arts. 169-180 started to discipline the subject.

The internet is the symbol of the new era, globalization, gave the ease of manipulation of data and information, the copyright infringement which becamw the the most common crime and practiced on the Internet. This offense was under Article 184 of the Criminal Code.

[...] Copyright is infringed by publishing or abusive reproduction without consent translation, plagiarism. There is crime and simple imitation, since there is no play, however playing article published in newspaper, news mentioning the author's name, signed, of which it was transcribed were not crime. Infringement of copyright occurs when the improper reproduction generates profit without permission of the author or their representative. In the case of computer program copyright if one of the parties to the dispute do not touch copyrights, but holds mere registration of SEI, for marketing purposes, is not represented by the illicit copying of the other. [...]


[...] It is necessary to prove in the application of property rights and their records, with proof of advertising, when this is necessary to face criminal type that become known. The diligence of search and seizure should be conducted by two experts appointed by the judge, who must verify the existence of grounds for the arrest and must make a survey by examining and describing what is found and that could constitute evidence of criminal offense, getting the its discretion and seizure of objects. [...]


[...] The crime exists even having no economic purpose. Consume up the crime with the job advertising, the damage to public faith is enough. It admitted attempt. The crime is determined by private prosecution, except public bodies. Search and seizure Most often, these crimes are brought by private prosecution. However, the criminal action will be public unconditioned in cases of articles 184, of the Penal Code and Article 191 of Law 9,279 / 96, even when dealing with public action crime, the victim can apply for search and seizure and he will propose private prosecution. [...]


[...] Recalling that are all provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code that are not also in accordance with the law later. The prosecution and trial of crimes against intellectual property follow the rules of ordinary procedure, however are punished with detention, meets to establish that special process of the Criminal Code and the Industrial Property Code standards do not bring any change to this procedural rite, as they all focus only on preliminary, preparatory measures for prosecution, that meet peculiarities of informatio delicti relevant to these crimes. [...]


[...] When referring to the law on commercial purpose is indispensable subjective element type. The agent error excludes deceit (type of error). The consummation varies according to the mode of conduct. Playback with many copies or copies is not continued Crume but only crime. In ducts hide no permanent crime. You can try to be plurissubsistente crime. The prosecution is carried by means of complaint, except when loss of public law entity, etc. Only when individuals or legal entities of private law is that it is abuse. [...]

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

A legal perspective on digital property: Laptops in United States customs and border protection

 Business & market   |  Management   |  Case study   |  12/11/2012   |   .doc   |   20 pages

A legal perspective on digital property: Laptops in United States customs and border protection

 Social studies   |  Educational studies   |  Case study   |  12/12/2012   |   .pdf   |   29 pages

Top sold for educational studies

Williams Act and takeover defences in the United States

 Social studies   |  Educational studies   |  Case study   |  05/13/2014   |   .doc   |   2 pages

La Celestina in its cultural and historical context

 Social studies   |  Educational studies   |  Case study   |  06/18/2013   |   .doc   |   3 pages