Search icone
Search and publish your papers

Is heterosexuality “natural”?

Or download with : a doc exchange

About the author

Level
Expert

About the document

Published date
Language
documents in English
Format
Word
Type
presentations
Pages
3 pages
Level
Expert
Accessed
0 times
Validated by
Committee Oboolo.com
0 Comment
Rate this document
  1. Introduction.
  2. Reasons why heterosexuality is natural.
  3. Women and heterosexuality.
    1. Forcing of women into heterosexuality.
  4. Gender power as the centre of speculation.
  5. Conclusion.
  6. Bibliography.

The most common definition of heterosexuality is that of a sexual identity of somebody who is sexually attracted to the opposite sex. According to Richardson, ?[Heterosexuality] is constructed as a coherent, natural, fixed and stable category; as universal and monolithic.? But what does ?natural? mean? I think that in order to answer this question properly, we should start by examining the different meanings of the word ?natural?. First, we will see how heterosexuality could be seen as ?natural?, in the sense of ?normal?, that is, in accordance with nature, neither determined socially, nor economically, nor technically, nor religiously etc.: heterosexuality being a ?good thing? (heteronormativity). Secondly, we will see to what extent the adjective ?natural? can be defined in opposition to culture, which is something acquired, artificial and sociologically constructed. Thirdly, we will have a look at mid 1970s feminist writings and how they tried, each in their own way, to challenge heterosexuality, because they perceived it as a compulsory institution. Finally, we will examine the impact of ?Queer Theory? on the question of the ?natural' status of heterosexuality and look at how it puts the very notion of sexual identity into question.

[...] For Plato, ?homosexual men couples? are more intimately bonded together than any heterosexual couple, because their is not a mortal one: they engender ideas. However, there might be another way of challenging compulsory heterosexuality. For Judith Butler, sexual identity is beyond the question of gender and as she points out in Gender Trouble, gender does not automatically follow from sex, there is no reason to believe that there are inevitably only two genders.? In her most influential book Gender Trouble (1990), Butler argued that feminism had made a mistake by trying to assert that 'women' were a group with common characteristics and interests. [...]


[...] Furthermore, other supporters of heteronormativity argue that heterosexuality is ?natural' because only heterosexual relations allow procreation. This view limits sexuality to the biological need to reproduce. However, biological factors are not sufficient to determine the sexual behaviour of the human body because from birth, he/she is influenced by outside factors and although heterosexual intercourse enables procreation, and although people claim that sex exists only for reproductive purposes, heterosexuality should also be seen as socially constructed, either by monotheist religions in order to produce more believers or by governments to maintain the economy via the creation of consumers, tax payers etc. [...]

Similar documents you may be interested in reading.

"What is queer theory and how does it explain the production of knowledge about sexuality?"

 Politics & international   |  Social sciences   |  Presentation   |  01/15/2009   |   .doc   |   5 pages

Compulsory heterosexuality, sexual autonomy and gender in Leslie Feinberg's 'Stone Butch Blues'

 Arts & media   |  Journalism   |  Term papers   |  03/11/2010   |   .doc   |   2 pages

Top sold for psychology

A psychologist's view of the glass castle

 Social studies   |  Psychology   |  Term papers   |  06/28/2010   |   .doc   |   4 pages

Learning and memory paper

 Social studies   |  Psychology   |  Case study   |  08/21/2013   |   .doc   |   4 pages