Problem Based Learning Task, Class Action, Maggie Ward
The film, Class Action by Michael Apted (1991) is a legal/law themed movie that is concerned with injuries that a defective automobile causes. The lawsuit takes a rather interesting dimension when it becomes apparent that the defence attorney and the plaintiff's attorney have a personal relationship; that of an estranged daughter and father. The plaintiff's attorneyJedediah Tucker Ward is the father of Maggie Ward, the defence, automobile manufacturer's attorney. The main theme of the Class Action, is more like that of the controversy the surrounded the Pinto Litigation. The plaintiff's attorney, Jed Ward is a liberal lawyer whose career is based on protecting the civil rights of people, so that they are not taken for granted by the powerful and the rich. Jed pursues this principle regardless of whatever he gets monetarily,; however, he does not follow up on his clients once he has settled a case; a very bad habit on his part. Maggie Ward on the other hand, has also made herself a career in law; however, her principle is the direct opposite of her father's, she represents the high and mighty, and has a self-interest agenda(Apted, 1991). In the film, she works for a large corporate law firm. She and Jed have a rather tense relationship; she hates her father because, apparently her father cheated on her mother.
Jed, the plaintiff's attorney is supposed to make a case against the large automobile manufacturer, whose car had exploded after collision and killed a woman, the plaintiff's wife. Jed believes, based on his research, that he has covered all the bases and that the case against the large automobile manufacturer is water tight(Apted, 1991). The case however, becomes complicated when he realizes that her estranged daughter will be representing the large automobile manufacturer; he is going to face her in court.
[...] Corporate Criminal Liability (2nd ed.). London: Sweet and Maxwell. [...]
[...] Under the English law, it would be based under the principles of tort law, which considers civil wrongs as a breach of legal duty that influencesthe right of a character to the degree that is considered under the law as sufficient enough for such an individual to complain. The tort system aims at vindicating distributive, retributive and corrective justice principles; it protects the autonomy of individuals(Harpwood, 2009). In this class action suit, the principles of the tort of negligence are applicable, as offered by English common law. In order to prove the tort of negligence, then, it must be shown that there existed duty of care” situation; a situation where the law attaches liability to carelessness. [...]
[...] H. (2009). Modern Tort Law 7/e (7th ed.). New York: Rout. McBarnet, D., Voiculescu, A., & Campbell, T. (2009). The New Corporate Accountability, Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Pinto, A., & Evans, M. (2008). [...]
[...] 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment. Beauchamp, B. (2009). Ethical Theory and Business. (Arnold, Ed.) (8th ed.). New York: Pearson Int.l Edition. Edwards, L., Edwards, J. S., & Wells, P. (2011). Tort Law (5th ed.). [...]
[...] She did produce the report but accompanied it with an avalanche of responses from discovery(Apted, 1991). She also changes the title or mislabels the engineer's report in a way the plaintiffs cannot easily located it, in addition to making it clear for them to run afoul of the set discovery rules. Thus, all she did was to play along. However, Maggie was not aware that prior to her production of the requested names and contacts, her supervisor, Michael Grazier, had actually destroyed the engineer's report. [...]
using our reader.