According to M. Sahlins, vulgar sociobiology is "the explication of human social behavior as the expression of the needs and drives of the human organism". This thesis implies that social organization is exclusively determined by biology. However, among other arguments, the author argues that one can observe a missing link between "the character of society" and human one, and therefore concludes that one cannot state that there is any biological determinism. Taking this statement into account, how can one qualify the complex relationship between nature, culture and human social behavior? While being based on the whole article, this reflection will mostly focus on two paragraphs, starting from "In the symbolic event?, to "as the cultural mediation of the organism? (P12-14).
[...] The use and abuse of biology, an anthropological critique of sociobiology Nature or nurture[1]? According to M. Sahlins', vulgar sociobiology is explication of human social behavior as the expression of the needs and drives of the human organism” ; this thesis implies that social organization is exclusively determined by biology. However, among other arguments, the author argues that one can observe a missing link between character of society” and human one, and therefore concludes that one cannot state that there is any biological determinism. [...]
using our reader.
By continuing to browse, you agree that Oboolo.com may use cookies or equivalent technology to store and / or access information on your device. This personal information (such as your browsing data and your IP address) may be used to present you with personalized content; to measure advertising and content performance, and to learn more about your use of the site. You can configure your choices to accept cookies or not, or to oppose them when the legitimate interest is used. You can also change your preferences at any time by clicking on the "Cookie settings" link at the bottom of the page of this site. For more information, see our Privacy Policy