The computer is without a doubt a central to the creation of culture in the twentieth-century (and beyond). Why is it that the computer has become so central to our culture when it is just a tool, or specifically a means for processing and spreading information? It many ways it is just like a piece of paper in that it can absorb what is applied to it, but it can also do so much more. It is a means of production that had seemingly endless possibilities.
The computer is so much more than just a piece of equipment. This is evident in the way that people present their computers in the offices, their homes and other places. When a computer sits in a home, it typically has a dedicated space, maybe even its own room, it is surrounded by periphery equipment like printers, a monitor, and even a computer chair and desk. When it is in an office the same setting exists. When a computer comes in the form of a laptop, expressions of culture can still be seen, for example in the way the laptop is decorated.
[...] There are important struggles over the meaning of computers in a cultural context. This is because they hold such an important place in Canadian society. The debate over the computer is especially relevant because it is very much related to people's vision of the future. In other words, people believe that computers hold the answer to where the future will go, meaning that computer capabilities will affect all aspects of our lives. This is a reasonable assumption. Debates over computers are quite speculative though, and this often leads to hype that is ungrounded, but it is also what makes cyber-culture such an interesting topic of study in sociology. [...]
[...] Most of us in this country have come to integrate computers into all or many aspects of the daily routine. We shop online, we bank online, and we do research online. For this reason, Canadians take a perspective of computers that is based on these ways in which the devices can help achieve certain lifestyles. This is because Canada is a developed and relatively affluent nation, which allows us in Canada to use computers in this way. Whereas, someone in a developing country does not see computers in the same way. [...]
[...] Functionalist theory can be used to analyse the computer as a cultural object. This is a theory that places emphasis on the scientific method, and those people that adhere to this theory view the world in an objectively real way. They argue that rules and regulations help dictate how people react and act with each other. Computers are very much the same, as they adhere to rules and regulations that serve this same purpose. Computers serve to dictate how people act, what they have to do, and how they interact with each other. [...]
[...] In this way, different parts of society work in coordination with each other to chart the path and progress of the computer. (Andersen & Taylor 2005: 486). It has been shown that the computer has been central to the creation of culture in the twentieth-century (and beyond). It is a machine that has been ever-changing since it was first introduced, and represents the potential of the future. This is a common perception of the cultural item that is held across the world, but regionally different people [...]
using our reader.