Theories, criminology, why people commit crime, crime, criminologists
Within criminology, it is quite significant to examine the reasons as to why individuals commit crime, in the continuing debate with regard to how to prevent as well as handle crime. There have been different theories emerging over the previous thirty years. Such theories are under exploration while combined or even individually as a best solution for reduction of types as well as crime levels continues to be searched for by criminologists.
[...] According to the labeling theory, someone makes the decision that a person is a criminal. Individuals in power make decisions on what actions are criminal. Therefore, the act that one is labeled a criminal happens to be what makes this person a criminal. Upon being labeled a criminal, a person's opportunities are taken away by the society, something that could eventually result to additional criminal behavior (Steven, 2015). Currently, there are too many explanations cloaked as reasons for crime. These assertions' misguided nature has impacts strategies for crime control seriously. [...]
[...] More theories are needed handle criminality. References Aldunate. (2015). Why Do People Commit Crime? . Retrieved from dpcdsb.org: http://dpcdsb.org/NR/rdonlyres/8B86F17D-99F7-4AE7-888E- 400D70906564/58335/34_Why_Do_People_Commit_Crime1.pdf Steven, B. (2015). Important Theories in Criminology: Why People Commit Crime. [...]
[...] According to the rational choice theory, it is due to the fact that individuals want to, that they commit crime. People live a criminal life out of the own choice. They decide to commit crime upon determination of potential risks such as getting caught as well as punishment, against rewards that could come with success in their acts (humans are rational with free will to choose to commit crime). Crime happens to be an immoral behavioral form which weakens the society (Steven, 2015). [...]
[...] This is particularly when food is of concern. Yet, this similar act as well attracts organized gangs' attention who steal to cost different businesses hundreds of millions every year. Similar crime having been conducted under very distinct motives. One to create too much money for the simplest and tiny work one can think of, and the other carried out for the purpose of survival. How does a person or even the law identify the typical criminal in this case because all have committed the same crime? [...]
using our reader.