A common criticism brought against Nietzsche, especially regarding his essay On Truth
and Lying in a Non-Moral Sense, is that Nietzsche seems to wholly refute the idea of an
objective truth and to simultaneously express his own ideas and opinions with a confidence and
assertion as if to suggest a truth. However, I think (and will argue in the first body paragraph)
that this contradiction is only apparent,in that two ideas share a single name and Nietzsche differentiates between two different “truths:” (1) Collective Truth—truth by definition, based on society's interpretations and conveyed through words; the truth that a group creates as a means of communication and security among its individuals.(2) Individual
Truth—the objective truth only in the sense that it can only be subjective and true, only
for the one. Relayed through a comparison of the two Truths, the point Nietzsche makes is that,
although both truths are based on a type of self-deception (explained in the second body
paragraph), it is the second truth—that of the man of intuition, the individual—that is worth
pursuing, that is the only one for a human being to live in a way that he calls life-affirming (final
body paragraph).
[...] The second truth Nietzsche mentions is the Individual Truth. This truth is not categorical or ordered on any great scale, as human beings are typically most comfortable with, but rather subjective, i.e. this truth is true only in each single thing “in itself.” Whereas the scientific truth “comes into being by making equivalent that which is nonequivalent” (145), by ordering many individuals and similar things into a single category (into a “truth”), the individual truth “know[s] neither forms nor concepts and hence no species, but only an ‘X' which is inaccessible to us and indefinable to us” (145), i.e., separate if not opposite of societal truth. [...]
[...] Nietzsche's On Truth and Lying in a Non-Moral Sense is an examination of what society commonly refers to as “truth,” in this essay generally identified as Collective Truth. He condemns such truths as “illusions of which we have forgotten they are illusions” (146), as stemming from “the obligation to lie in accordance with firmly established convention, to lie en masse and in a style that is binding for all” (146). It is seemingly contradictory, then, when 1 Nietzsche's opinions come across very direct and confident as though he considers them to be truths themselves. [...]
[...] Words (society's 5 “truths” by shared agreement), however, has no function beyond such communication, and can very likely even those other “truths,” those “truths of quite another kind,” which are fundamentals of human life, life of the ever-changing, ever-growing, “ever-new” human soul which words simply cannot even come close to conveying. Bibliography 1. Geuss, Raymond and Ronald Speirs, ed. “On Truth and Lying in a Non-Moral Sense.” Nietzsche: The Birth of Tragedy and Other Writings. New York, USA: Cambridge U, 1999. [...]
using our reader.
Oboolo has 20 years of experience in writing, optimizing, buying and selling documents online. Created by students, the Oboolo platform uses state-of-the-art anti-plagiarism tools, helping with analyzing and optimizing documents written by students or professionals.
By continuing to browse, you agree that Oboolo.com may use cookies or equivalent technology to store and / or access information on your device. This personal information (such as your browsing data and your IP address) may be used to present you with personalized content; to measure advertising and content performance, and to learn more about your use of the site. You can configure your choices to accept cookies or not, or to oppose them when the legitimate interest is used. You can also change your preferences at any time by clicking on the "Cookie settings" link at the bottom of the page of this site. For more information, see our Privacy Policy