Democratic peace theory, Kant, political issues, economic issues, globalization, human rights, secularism, international peacekeeping
Democratic peace theory, which postulates that democracies tend to avoid conflict with each other, has long been a cornerstone of international relations thinking. However, as the world evolves, some voices are being raised to question the validity of this theory. This essay therefore explores why some believe that democratic peace theory may be obsolete, examining changes in the global political landscape and theoretical critiques.
[...] W. Norton & Company. 6. Global Governance and International Relations ? Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2001). "Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition." Pearson. ? Haas, E. B. (1964). "Beyond the Nation-State: Functionalism and International Organization." Stanford University Press. 7. International Law and Institutions ? [...]
[...] ? Rosato, S. (2003). "The Flawed Logic of Democratic Peace Theory." American Political Science Review, 585-602. 5. Case Studies ? Mansfield, E. D., & Pollins, B. M. (2003). "The Study of Interdependence and Conflict." Journal of Conflict Resolution, 651-674. ? Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). "The Tragedy of Great Power Politics." W. [...]
[...] Thus, rather than considering the democratic peace theory as an immutable rule, it is crucial to view it as a useful theoretical tool, subject to adjustments and nuances based on the specific circumstances of today's world. Ultimately, understanding international relations requires a holistic approach that integrates a variety of factors to grasp the complexity of our ever-changing world. Bibliography 1. Immanuel Kant ? Kant, I. (1795). "Perpetual Peace." 2. Michael Doyle ? Doyle, M. W. (1983). "Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs." Philosophy and Public Affairs, 205-235. [...]
[...] ? Doyle, M. W. (1986). "Liberalism and World Politics." American Political Science Review, 1151-1169. 3. Evolution of the Global Political Landscape ? Ikenberry, G. J. (2011). "Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order." Princeton University Press. 4. Critiques of Democratic Peace Theory ? Russett, B. (1993). "Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World." Princeton University Press. [...]
[...] Profound differences on issues such as human rights, secularism, or the very definition of democracy can create frictions between nations that, in theory, share similar political values. The democratic peace theory may thus overlook these ideological differences, underestimating potential points of tension. Some critics emphasize that the democratic peace theory overlooks the crucial role of international institutions in promoting peace. Conflict resolution mechanisms, multilateral agreements, and international organizations can play a significant role in conflict prevention, regardless of the democratic or non-democratic nature of a state. [...]
APA Style reference
For your bibliographyOnline reading
with our online readerContent validated
by our reading committee