Search icone
Search and publish your papers

Communication about our defense against alleged anti-competitive conducts

About the author

Level
General public

About the document

Published date
Language
documents in English
Format
Word
Type
presentations
Pages
10 pages
Level
General public
Accessed
0 times
Validated by
Committee Oboolo.com
  1. The competence of the European Commission
  2. Analysis of our conducts
  3. Our remedies for the European Commission
  4. US Approach of competition law

Last Monday, we received a request for information from the DG COMP of the European Commission. The European Commission claims that a number of European and non-European companies have complained that our company is hindering competition in different ways, in particular:
- By treating more favourably, within the search results of the company's web search engine, links to WebRadar's own specialised web search services, putting the links of competitors in a less favourable position;
- By using the contents of third parties' web sites in WebRadar's specialised web search services without previous consent;
- By inducing third party web sites (publishers) to buy all or most of their on line search advertisements from WebRadar.
It is important to note that in April 2013 the European Commission published a first draft of commitments proposed by Google, our direct competitor, as mitigation for the Commission's allegation of abusive conduct by Google (similar to the conduct now contested to our company).

Recent documents in european union category

Is the European neighborhood policy only a policy of exclusion which separates the EU from its...

 Politics & international   |  European union   |  Presentation   |  03/28/2020   |   .doc   |   5 pages

The Common Agricultural Policy (PAC)

 Politics & international   |  European union   |  Presentation   |  08/30/2019   |   .doc   |   6 pages