Bank stress, global banking, Bank of Japan, revenue, financial shock, risk management, financially stressed bank, Japanese banking system, risk identification
The document answers the following question: "Dichotomize the banks into financially stressed and not financially stressed banks, and try to estimate the effect of a shock on the two groups. What are the differences and why?"
One of the primary determinants of a bank's ability to weather financial shocks is its risk management framework. Banks with effective risk identification and mitigation systems are better positioned to navigate uncertainties, potentially reducing their vulnerability to shocks. Additionally, the diversification of assets and revenue streams emerges as a critical factor. Banks with well-diversified portfolios can mitigate risks associated with dependencies on specific sectors or markets, contributing to enhanced resilience.
[...] Financially stressed banks face heightened challenges, including increased defaults and the need for recapitalization. On the other hand, not financially stressed banks are better positioned to weather shocks, leveraging their robust financial positions to expand their market share potentially. Understanding these differences is essential for policymakers, regulators, and market participants to formulate effective strategies for maintaining the stability and resilience of the Japanese banking system in the face of future challenges. References Deloitte. (2018, March 14). How does fintech in Japan compare to the rest of the world? Deloitte Japan. https://www2.deloitte.com/jp/en/pages/financial-services/articles/bk/jp-fi-fintech-in-japan.html Izumida, Y. [...]
[...] By categorizing banks based on these indicators, we can create a dichotomy between financially stressed and not financially stressed banks. Financially stressed banks may have lower capital buffers, higher non-performing loan ratios, and reduced profitability than their counterparts. One of the persistent challenges for Japanese banks has been the low-interest-rate environment. The Bank of Japan (BOJ) has implemented a near-zero interest rate policy for an extended period to combat deflation. While low interest rates can stimulate borrowing and spending, they can also squeeze banks' net interest margins, affecting their profitability. [...]
[...] In contrast, lax regulatory environments may contribute to excessive risk-taking, leaving banks more susceptible to shocks. The Japanese banking sector has undergone significant changes since the financial crisis of the 1990s, with efforts to strengthen risk management and regulatory frameworks (Wade, 2023). Banks implementing robust risk management practices are generally more adept at identifying and addressing potential vulnerabilities. Diversifying assets and revenue streams have also been a focus for many Japanese banks, allowing them to reduce dependence on specific sectors and markets. Moreover, Japan's regulatory and supervisory environment has played a pivotal role. [...]
[...] What are the differences and why? The Bank of Japan (BOJ) plays a crucial role in maintaining stability and fostering economic growth within the country (Deloitte, 2018). In the face of financial shocks, it is essential to understand how different banks respond to such disruptions. Several factors, including risk management practices, asset diversification, and the regulatory environment, influence banks' resilience and adaptability in the face of economic shocks. One of the primary determinants of a bank's ability to weather financial shocks is its risk management framework. [...]
[...] Financially stressed banks will likely face more significant challenges when confronted with a shock (McKinsey & Company, 2022). A shock, such as an economic downturn or a sudden increase in interest rates, could lead to a deterioration of their already weakened financial position. These banks might experience higher loan defaults, increased provisioning for bad loans, and a decline in profitability. The need for recapitalization and restructuring becomes more acute for financially stressed banks, potentially placing them at a higher risk of insolvency. [...]
APA Style reference
For your bibliographyOnline reading
with our online readerContent validated
by our reading committee